Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

PQ leader Pauline Marois following a debate Monday, August 20, 2012 in Montreal.

Paul Chiasson

The Parti Québécois had to backpedal Wednesday from Leader Pauline Marois's remarks that people running for public office in Quebec have to prove they have an appropriate grasp of the French language.

The separatist leader had been speaking Tuesday about her party's proposal to create a Quebec citizenship if it wins the Sept. 4 election.

"It's not for new Quebeckers, it's for everyone. All Quebec citizens who want to be elected as a mayor or a councillor, as a member of the legislature, must have a knowledge of French," Ms. Marois said during a campaign stop in Montreal.

Story continues below advertisement

Even long-established anglophone Quebeckers would have to heed that requirement, she said. "In the case of anglophones, be it a native or a new arrival, the common language here is French," Ms. Marois said. "Is there anyone who can imagine not knowing it?"

However, faced with an uproar from non-francophones and native groups, the party issued a statement Wednesday flatly contradicting the leader.

Non-francophone Canadians already residing in Quebec would be excluded from the language requirement since they are automatically Quebec citizens, the statement said.

The party's flip-flop was the latest twist in a campaign where Ms. Marois has often played up identity issues in a bid to woo the francophone electorate.

Some commentators are even speculating that such proposals, which are likely to be overturned by the courts, are part of a deliberate attempt to hike up antagonism against federal institutions.

The idea of Quebec citizenship was first outlined in Bill 195, a private bill Ms. Marois unveiled in 2007.

The communiqué the party sent out Wednesday pointed out that, under its initial proposal, Quebec citizenship would be automatically granted to all Canadian citizens already living in the province at the time Bill 195 would be enacted.

Story continues below advertisement

French language proficiency would only be required from"newcomers" — Canadians moving to Quebec after the law had been passed.

In addition to to French language proficiency, candidates also need to have "an appropriate knowledge of Quebec" and are asked to swear an oath of allegiance to the laws and constitution of Quebec.

However, without specifically mentioning the PQ or Ms. Marois, the Assembly of the First Nations of Quebec and Labrador warned Wednesday that "no one will impose its laws upon us."

In a statement, assembly chief Ghislain Picard said: "If the political parties think they can impose their citizenship and their language, they would do better to continue ignoring us. In any event, we will be waiting them out, after the elections."

The PQ argues that language abilities are a prerequisite to citizenship in many countries,  including Canada, which requires "adequate knowledge" of either French or English.

However, even bereft of Ms. Marois's latest musings about language, the French-only conditions of Bill 195 have been questioned. Law experts say Bill 195 violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Story continues below advertisement

Unilingual English-speaking Canadians who move to Quebec, for example for business reasons, wouldn't be able to run in provincial, municipal or school elections, noted three University of Ottawa law professors, Yan Campagnolo, Sébastien Grammond and Charles-Maxime Panaccio.

"Such violations are out of proportion with the objective of protecting and promoting of French . . .  It would be most surprising – and most unfortunate indeed – if the survival of French in Quebec could only be assured by creating two classes of citizens," the three professors wrote in an op-ed piece after Bill 195 was first introduced.

"I've rarely seen such improvisation on a subject that is not to be taken lightly. That proposition has existed for years in the PQ, and when it was presented it was supported by François Legault," said Liberal Leader Jean Charest, who was campaigning in St-Jean-sur-Richelieu.

"This was supposed to be their first legislation. I hope their slogan isn't 'We're ready.' Obviously, they're not."

With a report from Les Perreaux

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies