Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Coalition Avenir Quebec (CAQ) leader Francois Legault (L) and Liberal leader Jean Charest talk before a Quebec leaders' debate in Montreal August 19, 2012. Quebec voters will go to the polls in a provincial election on September 4.

CHRISTINNE MUSCHI/Reuters

The Coalition Avenir Québec has stalled and is now in a race for second place with the Quebec Liberals, according to the latest poll on the Quebec election campaign.

According to CROP, the numbers have stabilized four days ahead of the Sept. 4 election. The Parti Québécois has lost one point but remains in the lead with the support of 32 per cent of Quebeckers. The CAQ is still at 28 per cent and the Quebec Liberals are stable at 26 per cent. The left-wing separatist party Québec Solidaire has grown to 9 per cent, up from 7 per cent in the previous poll, which could hurt the PQ in tightly fought ridings.

The results suggest a tight race on Sept. 4, with the PQ in position to form a minority government and a battle for second place between the CAQ and the Liberals, according to CROP.

Story continues below advertisement

The CAQ is the party that has shown the most growth in popular support during the summer election, but it does not seem to be in a position for victory at this point of the campaign.

The poll was conducted between August 27 and 29, with 1,002 respondents providing a margin of error of 3.1 percentage points. Results could still change between now and election day as 22 per cent of respondents said their vote remains in flux and 12 per cent of voters are still undecided.

All three main parties in the race are colliding in the last days of the campaign on the thorny issue of Canada-Quebec relations. PQ Leader Pauline Marois said in an interview with The Globe and Mail that she would lead a "sovereigntist government" that would seek immediate transfers of federal powers from the Harper government.

Liberal Leader Jean Charest, meanwhile, is presenting himself as the only force that can block the separatist Parti Québécois from taking office. While Mr. Charest's position confirms a PQ lead in the polls, it aims to attract the support of all federalists in the province, including those who are supporting the CAQ.

"Anyone thinking of voting for the CAQ is going to end up with Pauline Marois. That's what the real politics is here," Mr. Charest said on Thursday.

On Friday, CAQ Leader François Legault said he is doubtful that a PQ government could wring any concessions out of the federal government.

Mr. Legault said he would support PQ demands that are in Quebec's interests, but he cautioned that chances of obtaining new powers or funding would be low.

Story continues below advertisement

"A PQ government would have no credibility to negotiate with Ottawa. We know that they have a secret agenda and that they want a referendum," Mr. Legault said at a news conference. "Their strategy is to fail in order to try and demonstrate that federalism doesn't work."

Mr. Legault said that he wants to lead a CAQ government that would neither promote federalism or sovereignty, pointing to a poll stating that support for the PQ's constitutional position is going down.

"Let's stop being in denial. That's not what Quebeckers want to talk about," Mr. Legault. "We're in the camp of people who don't want a referendum."

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies