Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Parti Québécois Leader Pauline Marois speaks after a one-on-one debate with Liberal Leader Jean Charest on Tuesday.

Paul Chiasson

Pauline Marois held her own in a one-on-one debate battle against Liberal Leader Jean Charest in what could be a march to a Parti Québécois government.

As sparks flew in Monday night's debate between the two in Montreal, Ms. Marois, leading in the polls, remained cool and composed as if to show that she had the demeanour to take the heat from her political foe and the credentials to become premier.

And when the debate turned to last spring's controversial student strike and social tensions, Ms. Marois questioned Mr. Charest's leadership. "You confronted our youth … you never do that when you are Premier of Quebec," Ms. Marois said.

Story continues below advertisement

If the PQ were to form a government, Ms. Marois has promised that Quebec would change significantly. She has reiterated that the province would fight Ottawa for more powers to assume full authority over jurisdictions such as culture and employment insurance. And the possibility of another referendum on sovereignty would be a major factor in her dealings with the rest of the country.

From the outset, she placed Mr. Charest on the defensive in tackling the delicate issue of government corruption. He appeared angry in a number of ugly confrontations on the issue.

The embattled Mr. Charest nonetheless mounted an aggressive attack against the PQ Leader in a desperate attempt to defend his government's integrity.

In one emblematic exchange, Mr. Charest defended two ministers who quit under allegations of influence peddling, Tony Tomassi and David Whissell.

"You have said things and made insinuations that were never founded," Mr. Charest said in an angry tone. "Your mudslinging has harmed the entire political class. ... All you are doing is dirtying the reputation of someone who was never accused of doing anything wrong."

He also defended Mr. Tomassi, saying he also left government for personal reasons. He was charged with fraud for allegedly accepting favours about a month after he quit.

The debate instantly turned intense and argumentative in Monday's one-on-one format, where the two leaders sat facing one another with few interruptions from the moderator. There were no interruptions, of course, from the election rivals who were sidelined after Sunday's four-person debate. Mr. Charest was more combative, while Ms. Marois appeared much more comfortable in the format than during Sunday's affair.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Charest fought back accusing Ms. Marois of backing intimidation and violence by wearing the red square, the symbol of the student movement, in support of their strike. But that only drew attention to the fact that Mr. Charest has done few spontaneous streeters with voters during the campaign. "Mr. Charest needs to spend more time in the street. Go downtown and find out how our citizens are shocked."

In his attempt to shore up declining support with francophone voters, Mr. Charest defended his government's handling of the thorny language issue. "The French language is not receding in Quebec, it's advancing. You are dividing Quebeckers," he said to Ms. Marois about the PQ plan to eventually hold another referendum of sovereignty.

"Quebec needs stability, not a referendum that will divide Quebeckers," Mr. Charest said, adding Ms. Marois is "playing casino" with the future of Quebec. Ms. Marois tried to be reassuring, insisting that no referendum will be held unless there is a desire for one from Quebeckers. "We won't be conducting a referendum in hiding, we'll have time for a debate, we'll discuss it. We'll show Quebeckers we are poorly served by federalism."

She spent several minutes ducking a direct question about whether she will call a referendum if she wins.

"I hope there will be [a referendum] but I want to maintain the possibility of making that decision, so that when we hold one, we'll win it," she said.

The dynamics Monday night were much different than what viewers saw on Sunday night's all-leaders debate.

Story continues below advertisement

That two-hour debate was far from a serene affair, but settled little. The three main leaders traded potshots in an inconclusive draw, which likely served Ms. Marois in her mission to maintain a lead. One leader that fared well was Françoise David, the leader of the left-wing Québec Solidaire.

Ms. David is excluded from the remaining three debates.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the authors of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies