Skip to main content

Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff arrives for a news conference Sunday, April 24, 2011 in Toronto.

Paul Chiasson/Paul Chiasson/The Canadian Press

Languishing in the polls, challenged on his right by the dominating Conservatives and on his left by a resurgent NDP, Michael Ignatieff says he entered the final week of this federal election campaign in a mood of "serene optimism."

But it was exasperation that appeared to come through more often in his meeting Sunday afternoon with The Globe and Mail's editorial board: Exasperation that his commitment to Canada could still be questioned six years after his return from abroad.

And exasperation that his Liberal vision of a federal government - uniting Canadians behind a new generation of national programs targeting workers, caregivers and students - is being ignored by Canadians who may prefer the managerial competence of Stephen Harper or the full-throated restructuring proposed by Jack Layton.

Story continues below advertisement

Over the past four weeks of the election campaign Mr. Ignatieff has seen "an energized party, full rooms, people understanding how important the election is to them."

He brushed off questions about why so many voters were drifting toward the NDP, which currently rivals the Liberals in the polls in a race for second place.

"Sixty per cent of the population doesn't want to go on with the Harper government," he said. "Now they're figuring out who can get us there. That's what happening."

But "it's choosing time," he added. "We have to remind Canadians that we have the experience of government."

And he continued to emphasize his party's proposal to subsidize college tuition, enhance child care and fund home care when family members fall ill.

Mr. Ignatieff entered this election at a disadvantage, his public profile damaged by relentless Conservative attack ads questioning his commitment to Canada after he spent 35 years outside the country.

He bristled when asked why he had come back to take up federal politics.

Story continues below advertisement

"It's my country," he replied, then paused. "It's my country. (Pause.) It's my home."

He had been raised in a home dedicated to public service. (His father, George Ignatieff, was a prominent diplomat.) "Public service is not an abstraction to me."

"… And I've had two and a half years of people questioning that. And you can imagine how deeply I feel about this question."

Mr. Ignatieff was at his most passionate when it was pointed out that "passionate" is a word he uses frequently. Is the choice, he was asked, between his dream of a possible Canada and a hard-headed calculation of how best to apportion federal revenues?

"The Canada you dream of - dammit, this is the country I grew up in!" and he pounded the table.

Canadians, he said, have always understood the importance of equality of opportunity between region, races, classes - the Liberal nation-building exercise stretching from King through Trudeau.

Story continues below advertisement

"This is what worked," he insisted. "This is what made us so successful. This is what we have to rediscover and re-dedicate ourselves to."

"You'll hear reason from Harper. That's not the issue. What you will not hear is a vision of the country. You will not hear that from him. He doesn't have it. It's not there."

Between passion and pragmatism; vision and prudence; Ignatieff and Harper.

Or perhaps, some Canadians are pondering, someone else entirely.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies