Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Support quality journalism
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24weeks
The Globe and Mail
Support quality journalism
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Globe and Mail website displayed on various devices
Just$1.99
per week
for the first 24weeks

var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){console.log("scroll");var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1);

The Parliament buildings are seen in Ottawa, Monday, January 25, 2016.

Adrian Wyld/THE CANADIAN PRESS

The NDP says it has received a hopeful signal in its legal dispute over former satellite offices in Montreal, Toronto and Quebec City.

The Federal Court of Canada has decided to admit into evidence an affidavit that was challenged by the attorney-general, the House of Commons Speaker and the board of internal economy, a closed-door Commons committee that polices spending.

The decision is a development in a much greater battle for the beleaguered party – a saga that continues to drain party coffers and internal energy.

Story continues below advertisement

The NDP, which strongly denies the offices were used for non-parliamentary purposes, is now relying on its own money to contest the board's decision to order 68 MPs to repay $2.7-million in parliamentary funds that went towards the operations.

"It is important to stand by our members of Parliament and former members of Parliament to help them defend themselves against this politically motivated vendetta targeting them personally," NDP national director Karl Belanger said.

"We think it is unfair and it goes against every principle of natural law and natural justice."

The Federal Court's recent finding on the admissibility of the affidavit is significant because it is the first time an outside body has weighed in and rejected arguments made against the NDP, he added.

"That's a huge setback for the [board's] case," Mr. Belanger said.

The affidavit, written by Professor Maxime Saint-Hilaire at the University of Sherbrooke, argues the satellite spending issue is not a matter of parliamentary privilege.

It touches on a bigger legal question at hand: whether the court has the ability to pronounce on parliamentary matters.

Story continues below advertisement

The board, the attorney-general and the Speaker are using taxpayer dollars to fight this issue, citing concern it could infringe on the constitutional independence of the House of Commons.

The board has yet to respond to a question about how much money has been spent on legal fees to date.

In March, The Canadian Press reported Prime Minister Justin Trudeau spiked an out-of-court settlement in the long-running dispute.

At the time, Liberal House Leader Dominic LeBlanc was adamant Mr. Trudeau had nothing to do with it, despite multiple sources who said it was, in fact, the Prime Minister himself who put an end to negotiations.

The board of internal economy is the only body responsible for addressing the NDP's satellite offices and this misuse of public funds, Mr. LeBlanc said at the time.

He also insisted the Liberals never contemplated settling the matter out of court.

Story continues below advertisement

"We have always been of the view that the NDP misused public funds and should therefore reimburse taxpayers," Mr. LeBlanc said.

New Democrats say Commons administrators grossly inflated the amount of money contributed from their office budgets towards the salaries of satellite employees.

Former Toronto MP Dan Harris was originally ordered to pay more than $140,000, but late last year was effectively exonerated by the Commons' chief financial officer.

Ex-Montreal MP Isabelle Morin was also on the hook to repay $169,117 in salary paid to an employee, but her bill was reduced to below $30,000 because the employee worked most of the time in her riding office, not the Montreal party office.

NDP Leader Tom Mulcair, who is poised to step away from the helm of the party once a successor is named in the fall of 2017, also faces a hefty bill of more than $400,000.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies