Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Instead of his trademark backpack, he carried a bag of materials given to all delegates at this weekend's federal NDP convention.

Still, there was no mistaking Stéphane Dion.

The former federal Liberal leader stood out amidst more than 1,500 New Democrats at Vancouver's new convention centre on Saturday.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Dion said he was there because Bob Rae, the interim Liberal leader, asked him to attend as an observer.

To that end, Mr. Dion spent Saturday watching resolution debates, and speeches to delegates.

At one point, he took a telephone break to dial into a virtual convention of his own party, which ended with an agreement to postpone the next leadership vote to no later than June, 2013.

The former federal environment minister also said he ended up shaking hands with many New Democrats, who sidled up to greet him.

"People are very friendly," Mr. Dion said in a brief interview. "Many people told me they voted for me in 2008."

But they may not have voted for the Liberal party in 2011, which was reduced to third place in Parliament, and took hits in Mr. Dion's native Quebec.

Not Mr. Dion. The former academic survived as the MP for Saint-Laurent-Cartierville.

Story continues below advertisement

"I'm well known in my constituency, in my riding. I worked very hard for the last 15 years. I am respected there so it helped for me to survive," he said.

"Many of my colleagues who worked very hard did not survive."

The author of the Clarity Act setting out rules for Quebec sovereignty said he fears Jack Layton may think that in order to remain popular in Quebec - the base for more than half the party's new 103-member caucus - he needs to appease separatists.

In particular, he questioned Mr. Layton's assertion that 50-per-cent-plus-one would justify sovereignty.

"He should recognize that his own party decided you need two-thirds to amend his constitution so why does he think, in order to please Quebec, he needs to accept an idea that would break up Canada?"

He also said Mr. Layton should explicitly ask his new MPs if they believe in a united Canada.

Story continues below advertisement

"Some of them may have been separatists in the past, and it's OK if they stopped because we will not say no to every Quebecker who was a separatist once in his life. I think this is another mistake he is doing," he said.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies