Skip to main content

Former MP Jay Hill broke rules by calling ministers about energy deal, ethics watchdog says

Former MP Jay Hill speaks during Question Period in the House of Commons in May, 2010. The federal ethics watchdog has determined that Mr. Hill breached the Conflict of Interest Act when he contacted his ex-colleagues about a forthcoming multinational energy deal.

CHRIS WATTIE/REUTERS

A former member of the Harper cabinet has been slapped by the federal Ethics Commissioner for contravening the Conflict of Interest Act, after making calls to ministers regarding a 2011 oil industry deal.

In a report released Tuesday, Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson concluded that the former government house leader Jay Hill – who retired from government in 2010 – violated post-employment guidelines when he made a call to three ministers regarding a deal on which his wife, Leah Murray, was working as a public affairs consultant.

In May 2011, Mr. Hill learned that Progress Energy Corp. of Calgary and Malaysia's state-owned Petronas planned to announce a $1-billion deal to jointly develop natural gas properties in British Columbia. Progress retained Ms. Murray as a public affairs consultant, whose duties included communicating to the federal government and key ministers.

Story continues below advertisement

On learning of the pending announcement, Mr. Hill called three ministers – International Trade Minister Ed Fast, Industry Minister Christian Paradis, and Indian and Aboriginal Affairs Minister John Duncan, then Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development – to give them a "heads up" and to encourage Mr. Fast and Mr. Duncan to contact the Progress Energy president.

Following the 2011 deal, Petronas announced and completed a $6-billion takeover of Progress last year, but there is no allegation that Mr. Hill involved himself in that transaction.

Under federal conflict rules, former ministers are prohibited from taking improper advantage of their previous public position. Ms. Dawson said Mr. Hill violated that rule by making calls that could be seen to advance the business interests of his wife.

"He took advantage of his former status and position to facilitate access to the ministers for his spouse, her employer and its client and thereby contravened" a section of the act, she concluded.

The commissioner added, however, that there was no evidence that Mr. Hill had managed to arrange communications between the ministers and Progress Energy officials, or that he had made presentations to former colleagues to influence their actions, since only Mr. Paradis was a former colleague in cabinet and Mr. Hill had not sought to arrange a call between him and Progress.

Mr. Hill insisted Tuesday that he had done nothing wrong, but apologized to the Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his former caucus colleagues for "any inconvenience" he may have caused the government.

"At no time did I or my spouse receive any credit, benefit or financial remuneration, personally or professionally, for making these calls," he said in an e-mailed statement.

Story continues below advertisement

"In politics, perception is reality, and in this case, the federal Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson and her colleagues have determined I was in contravention of the act by taking 'improper advantage of my previous public office.' I strongly dispute this conclusion, and the process and methods she undertook to arrive at her decision," he said.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter