Skip to main content

Politics Former premier excoriates PQs for dogmatic focus on zero deficit and ignoring education

Former Quebec premier Jacques Parizeau told hearings in Montreal that Quebec's securities regulator should exercise its veto power to ensure Montreal doesn't become a shell for derivatives.

Graham Hughes/The Canadian Press/Graham Hughes/The Canadian Press

The Parti Québécois obsession with reaching a zero deficit next year is thwarting any chances of abolishing university tuition fees, says former PQ premier Jacques Parizeau.

In a scathing attack against the PQ government, Mr. Parizeau said tuition-free universities remained a realistic objective if the PQ had the political will to achieve it.

"The zero deficit has spoiled everything. As soon as you set a deadline for reaching a zero [deficit] objective and that it becomes a religion, you stop thinking. You cut back on everything and you stop asking questions," Mr. Parizeau said in an interview with the Montreal daily Le Devoir.

Story continues below advertisement

The harsh assessment, coming from a prominent and influential former party leader, embarrassed the Marois government, which is facing strong criticism over the summit in two weeks on the future of universities.

Abolishing university tuition fees has been a long-term goal ever since Quebec's modern postsecondary education system was created in the 1960s.

However, the PQ government has refused to consider the option in the short term, saying that it would undermine efforts at reaching a zero deficit.

Mr. Parizeau's comments have given credibility to the more militant student groups that continue to demand the elimination of tuition fees as they did during last spring's provincewide student strike.

"For today's youth to want to discuss this [tuition-free university], well there was a whole generation before them that thought the same thing. They aren't outside the norm, they aren't out of order. It's ridiculous to send them packing," Mr. Parizeau said.

The former premier said there was no reason for the former Liberal government to abolish the tax on capital for banks that did nothing to create jobs.

He said if the tax was reinstated on banks, it would go a long way to help cover the cost of abolishing tuition fees.

Story continues below advertisement

Minister of Higher Education Pierre Duchesne, who as a journalist wrote an extensive biography of Mr. Parizeau, accepted with humility his mentor's criticism.

Mr. Duchesne said he remained open to a debate on tuition-free universities at the summit but insisted it wasn't part of his government's agenda.

"We have to keep open all possible avenues. But who knows where Quebec will be in 10 years or in 15 years. A lot of things can happen," Mr. Duchesne said.

The more moderate student groups that are demanding a freeze on tuition fees rather than outright elimination have rejected the government's proposal for indexation.

Indexation, according to Ms. Marois, is equal to a freeze, a position she will defend at the summit.

At the other end of the spectrum, university rectors and principals insisted it would be impossible to implement the $250-million cutback over two years the government is demanding from them.

Story continues below advertisement

The PQ was ready to accept some creative accounting by allowing universities to place the cutbacks in the deficit column while giving the institutions five years to pay the money back.

The opposition accused Finance Minister Nicolas Marceau of distorting the facts and improvising on the backs of the cash-strapped universities.

"As Minister of Finance you are forcing universities to have real deficits so that you can offer yourself a false zero deficit," said Liberal finance critic Raymond Bachand in the National Assembly.

According to Mr. Parizeau, the government has been debating the issue the wrong way. It should be first about defining what is expected of universities rather than how they should be funded, he said.

"You need to first set the objectives and then look for money, not the other way around."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter