Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Prime Minister Stephen Harper stands during question period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Monday, May 26, 2014.

Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press

Trust us. That's been the Conservative government's response to creeping concerns that big-data surveillance is silently eroding Canadians' privacy rights.

And now, Prime Minister Stephen Harper has selected as watchdog over those rights, as Privacy Commissioner, an official who has for years advised the government, behind closed doors, on the activities of government that put those rights most at risk.

Trust us. Mr. Harper's nominee, Daniel Therrien, is competent and experienced.

Story continues below advertisement

But this is not a job where simply trusting the government will do. The office of the privacy commissioner is one of a handful of flimsy mechanisms supposed to provide accountability. Mr. Therrien is, by all accounts, competent and experienced. But he is, by all appearances, unqualified to provide accountability.

The new Privacy Commissioner will step into the post just as Canadians are beginning to learn that their government collects a vast amount of their data, and just as the government is about to pass legislation – in a disconcertingly sneaky way, camouflaged as cyberbullying legislation – to make it easier for authorities to collect such data.

Privacy Commissioners also watch companies' use of personal information, and government storing of personal data. But the big issue the next commissioner faces, said Halifax privacy lawyer David Fraser, is the balance of privacy rights with the "surveillance state."

In walks the unknown Mr. Therrien. On Tuesday, he'll spend an hour – one hour – before a committee of MPs, and for the very the first time will air his views on privacy in public.

For nine years, he's been the Assistant Deputy Attorney General for Public Safety, Defence, and Immigration. That made him the senior legal advisor for issues at the heart of privacy, around the RCMP, the spies at CSIS, and electronic eavesdroppers at CSEC.

He negotiated with the U.S. the exchange of personal information under Mr. Harper's Border Vision accord, a point of concern for past Privacy Commissioners.

He also would have played a substantial role in the effort to expand powers to obtain information on Canadians' phone calls, e-mails, and Internet activities, now in the controversial Bill C-13 before Parliament.

Story continues below advertisement

In short, Mr. Therrien has played a big role in building the current state of privacy rights. That gives him expertise but means he'd have to overcome human nature to take a detached eye to his past work.

He might face actual conflicts of interest, too. As a lawyer, his "client" has been the departments most often involved in privacy cases, including litigation, so he might have to recuse himself often. And he's barred from using his former client's confidences, so unless the government waives solicitor-client privilege, he must both conceal and reveal its privacy practices.

Mr. Therrien might be able to overcome all that. Lawyers move from defence to prosecution. There's no reason to believe he's anything but fair-minded. Perhaps he can be unusually clear-headed and critically minded about his past work, switching instantly to watchdog. But Canadians can't just be asked to assume he will.

The government argues Mr. Therrien was selected through a rigorous process – but it was a backroom vetting fit for choosing a mandarin. The Privacy Commissioner isn't a mandarin, rather a parliamentary officer, and public watchdog. NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair has opposed the choice.

In these complex issues, Canadians must be able to trust the privacy commissioner will be on their side. After all, Mr. Harper and his ministers routinely refuse to discuss surveillance issues, despite concerns raised by leaks and courts, and instead insist the public should be reassured by the oversight of watchdogs like the CSEC Commissioner.

Governments, Liberal and Conservative, have for a decade tried to pass a law to make it easier for authorities to collect Internet and phone data. After the Conservatives' first controversial attempt died, they slipped it into Bill C-13, ostensibly aimed at combating cyberbullying – before the Commons now. That doesn't exactly provide reason to trust the government is being forthright.

Story continues below advertisement

But there shouldn't be any need to just trust the government's choice of privacy watchdog. The point of a Privacy Commissioner is to provide accountability. And accountability is crucial to democracy, the system built on the idea that the public cannot just trust those who govern.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies