Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Prime Minister Stephen Harper speaks in Quebec City on Feb. 6, 2014.

MATHIEU BELANGER/Reuters

The political question around Tuesday's budget is how it will affect the economic uncertainty Canadians already feel. That's the ground Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his opponents will be fighting over for the next twelve months.

Mr. Harper has used that uncertainty to his political advantage, painting himself as the safe hand to steer Canada through global economic threats. But the economy, in Canada and the United States, may be starting to spin those concerns in another direction.

Canadians are feeling financially vulnerable. Consumer confidence is eroding. The NDP and the Liberals are trying to appeal to those concerns, and shake Mr. Harper's advantage – in two very different ways.

Story continues below advertisement

That's what makes this year's budget bigger than the billing. Finance Minister Jim Flaherty has presold it as a bridge budget with few big spending or tax measures. It will stay the course until next-year's pre-election budget, widely expected to offer tax cuts.

But no news is still a narrative for the Conservatives: This document will budget the path out of deficit and back to balanced books in 2015-16, and the underlying message is that public finances are being prudently steered toward better times.

It fits the storyline that has worked for Mr. Harper in two elections, when he portrayed his Liberal opponents, Stéphane Dion and Michael Ignatieff, as shaky risks. The economy wasn't perfect, but Canada was coming through tough times better than a lot of Western countries, Mr. Harper argued.

But that might not be so easy over the next year.

The Bloomberg-Nanos consumer-confidence index has dipped to its lowest point since May. Canadians, said pollster Nik Nanos, are somewhat pessimistic about their personal finances, but increasingly worried about the prospects for the Canadian economy overall. "That makes for a grumpy electorate," he said.

Canadians have had economic jitters before. What's different now? There are signs the U.S. economy is bouncing back, and perhaps a perception it is overtaking Canada's.

"For many Canadians, the key comparator in terms of the performance of the economy is the United States," Mr. Nanos said. "If we're doing as well or better than the States, Canadians feel strong and confident. When we're not doing as well, it's, 'why aren't we doing as well?' "

Story continues below advertisement

If the U.S. recovery outstrips Canada's, Mr. Harper's reputation as economic steward, a major advantage now, may be more vulnerable. Both the NDP and the Liberals are trying to shake it.

The New Democrats, for the most part, are trying to compete on pocketbook issues with the Conservatives, who favour niche tax cuts and propose consumer-choice plans like pick-and-pay cable TV. NDP finance critic Peggy Nash called for caps on ATM fees and a return of ecoENERGY tax credits for energy-saving home renovations – an appeal to Canadians' concerns about making ends meet.

The Liberals, however, are opening up a broader attack on Conservative economic management. They've stepped up near-daily questioning of what they call a record of slow growth, poor job creation and high household debt. That may seem like an obvious tactic, but Mr. Harper's opponents have previously shied away from sustained attacks on his handling of the economy.

Liberal finance critic Scott Brison argues they look increasingly out of touch with Canadians' concerns about rising debts, the difficulty their working-age kids have in finding jobs, stagnant wages and vulnerable pensions. The Liberals are focusing on Canadians' sense of financial insecurity and the lack of opportunity for youth, he said.

So far, however, the Liberals are opposing Mr. Harper's economic policies but haven't proposed many of their own – both opposition parties seem to be leaving their substantive economic programs until an election is closer. But it is an effort to touch that nerve of economic insecurity, and use it to chip away at Mr. Harper's advantage on economic issues.

The Conservatives have levers: Even a bridge budget will contain some measures – perhaps low-cost tax measures to address some of those pocketbook fears, along with a reiteration that they'll keep a cap on spending and taxes.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Harper's advantage is that on economics, he's seen by many as a less risky choice. But if the economy doesn't keep pace with the U.S., Canadians are likely to feel more insecure – and his opponents will seek to stoke a perception that he's not protecting them any more.

Campbell Clark is The Globe's chief political writer.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies