Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Globe and Mail columnist Jeffrey Simpson.

The Globe and Mail

The high point of British support for Europe arguably came in 1975, two years after the country joined what was then called the European Community (EC). Since then, the British have slowly soured on European integration.

In 1975, the British voted 67 per cent in a referendum in favour of the EC. When a major polling firm asked in that year whether the European Community was a "Good Thing," half of the population said yes. Even the major papers, many now hostile to Europe in general and the European Union in particular, favoured British entry.

Brexit explained: The latest updates and what you need to know

Story continues below advertisement

For the next four decades, support for Britain in Europe and British views of the European Community rose and fell, but the general drift was down. The idea that Thursday's referendum on EU membership, with so many British wanting to leave, represents something new is false. There are fresh drivers of opinion – migration and inequality – but Britain never had a love affair with Europe. It was a loveless marriage of convenience.

In 1981, two and a half years into Margaret Thatcher's first term as prime minister, that same polling firm found only 21 per cent of Brits thought the European Community a "Good Thing." In 1977, with John Major as prime minister, only 36 per cent of British considered the EC a "Good Thing."

The last prime minister who genuinely believed in the virtues of the EU was Tony Blair. Since Edward Heath, Margaret Thatcher's predecessor as prime minister who negotiated Britain's entry into the EC, most prime ministers have been lukewarm defenders or frequent critics. None of them, except Mr. Blair, tried to make the case for Europe as anything more than a utilitarian arrangement, a balance sheet.

The British did not change, but the European Union did. On the continent, the original six countries that created the European integration project always wanted tighter political union, which meant social policies, common laws, trade negotiations conducted by Brussels and later, of course, a common currency. The British never bought into a tighter political union and stayed out of the euro zone.

Europe changed for two other reasons. German unification made Germany an axis around which the EU would turn. The old French-Germany axis faded, as France slipped as an economic power in comparison with Germany, and Germany was thrust into the role as the EU's leading political actor, a role Germany did not want.

Then the Iron Curtain disappeared. The countries of Eastern Europe, desperate to throw off the shackles of the Soviet-imposed Warsaw Pact (the military alliance) and Comecon (the economic bloc), hungered to join West European institutions. The Cold War ties that bound the West, including the European Community/Union, yielded to wider but less easily defined communalities.

When these new countries were allowed in, Europe became more complicated. It was subject to new pressures and demands, including the right of free movement that sent citizens from these countries heading to Britain for work. These countries were geographically removed from Britain, unlike the countries across the English Channel.

Story continues below advertisement

The first European institutions were established in the aftermath of war, and were therefore designed to preserve peace. These institutions succeeded brilliantly, but success was taken for granted as the decades passed. The wartime generation died. Subsequent generations simply assumed peace.

British diplomats often shone inside the institutions of Europe, but the shining was unknown outside the walls of the Berlaymont building, the EU headquarters in Brussels. Back home, the diplomats were depicted in the rabidly anti-EU British press as putty in the hands of the continentals and, worse, connivers with the continentals in supranational schemes.

When two crises washed over the EU, the institution struggled to respond, and that struggle further soured British opinion. The first was the made-in-America financial crisis; the second was the mass migration from failed states and economic basket cases from Bangladesh to Algeria.

Neither of these were the EU's fault and no easy answers presented themselves for these two nasty crises. Moreover, the British perception of being overrun by migration – a perception fuelling a desire to leave the EU – had much more to do with Britain's colonial past and domestic immigration policies than EU membership.

So after decades of drift away from the European idea, with few voices of prominence ready to speak positively rather than defensively about the European project, Britain wobbles to a fateful decision.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies