Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Harper aide Dimitri Soudas descends the stairs to the House of Commons on Jan. 31, 2008.

CHRIS WATTIE/Reuters

Stephen Harper said there was nothing unusual about his office's efforts to influence the appointment of a new president at the Montreal Port Authority in 2007, but other leaders accused the Conservatives of condoning political interference.

Ignoring concerns raised by a former minister and members of the board at the port, Mr. Harper said his spokesman and other Conservative officials had every right to promote the candidacy of Montreal engineer Robert Abdallah.

"It's normal," Mr. Harper said. "The government [expressed its preference] the board took another decision. We respect that decision; we work with the board and that president."

Story continues below advertisement

But the leaders of the Liberal Party, the Bloc Québécois and the NDP said the repeated efforts by Dimitri Soudas, Mr. Harper's long-time spokesman, and other Conservative officials to secure Mr. Abdallah's nomination were a clear patronage attempt.

Bloc Leader Gilles Duceppe said the interventions, revealed by The Globe and Mail and Radio-Canada, went against the Canada Marine Act that states that the selection of the port's president is up to the board of directors.

"This is a troubling matter, we're talking about pressure, threats and lies," Mr. Duceppe told reporters. "This is called interfering in a decision-making process."

One of the issues that generated controversy on the campaign trail was the fact that Mr. Soudas denied meeting board members on the matter of Mr. Abdallah's candidacy in front of a parliamentary committee in 2008.

However, he is now acknowledging meeting board members at a restaurant in Montreal, where Mr. Abdallah's candidacy was promoted.

"There's a possibility that he lied under oath, and that's a big problem," said Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff. "A lack of respect towards institutions is something that happened more than once. So the voters will decide about this."

Conservative officials said Mr. Soudas and the Conservative government promoted Mr. Abdallah's candidacy well after the initial preference was expressed, especially as it became clear that he did not make the board's shortlist.

Story continues below advertisement

NDP Leader Jack Layton blasted the Conservatives for failing to get rid of patronage, despite their promises before coming to power in 2006.

"The result is that we end up with the same old pork-barrelling approach to the appointment of friends by the government," Mr. Layton said. "And clearly this is an example, and a case in point."

The Conservatives have yet to explain how they determined favouring Mr. Abdallah as president of the port. Controversial construction industry boss Antonio Accurso was also supportive of Mr. Abdallah's candidacy, as was Montreal councillor Frank Zampino, sources said.

Michael Fortier, the minister of public works at the time of the appointment, said his office contacted port officials and urged them to disregard any political pressure.

"I asked my office to send the message that the Prime Minister did not have a preferred choice and that the selection of a new president was up to the board of directors and its members," Mr. Fortier said.

The former chairman of the board at the port, Marc Bruneau, said board members grew testy as Mr. Soudas promoted Mr. Abdallah's candidacy at the restaurant meeting.

Story continues below advertisement

"There certainly was interference, as they met us on the specific issue of the nomination of the new president," Mr. Bruneau said.

The board ultimately chose a different candidate, Patrice Pelletier, who was president of L-3 Communications SPAR Aerospace Ltd.

With a report from Gloria Galloway

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies