Skip to main content

Governor of the Bank of Canada, Stephen Poloz(right) and Deputy Governor Tiff Macklem speak with Senate Standing Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce Chair Irving Gerstein Wednesday Nov. 20, 2013 in Ottawa. Prime Minister Stephen Harper is sticking by Gerstein, who is Conservative Party’s top fundraiser, amid growing criticism of his role in containing the scandal over Mike Duffy’s expenses

Adrian Wyld/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Prime Minister Stephen Harper is sticking by the Conservative Party's top fundraiser amid growing criticism of his role in containing the scandal over Mike Duffy's expenses – now the subject of an RCMP probe.

Conservative Fund chair Irving Gerstein – a senator and self-styled "bagman" – initially agreed to use party money to pay back Mr. Duffy's ill-claimed expenses earlier this year, RCMP allege. Mr. Gerstein also called a partner at Deloitte for information on an audit into Mr. Duffy's expenses, and asked whether the audit would be stopped if Mr. Duffy repaid his expenses, court documents show.

The police allegations, released this week, have raised questions about the integrity of the audit. A Senate committee on Thursday moved to summon the Deloitte auditors back to Parliament Hill because of the developments, Senate sources said.

Story continues below advertisement

During Question Period on Thursday, the NDP accused Mr. Gerstein of being "an active participant" in plans to cover up the Senate scandal. However, Mr. Harper said the police probe is appropriately focused on Mr. Duffy and Nigel Wright, Mr. Harper's former chief of staff who went on to personally repay $90,000 of Mr. Duffy's expenses. "It is Mr. Wright and Mr. Duffy who are under investigation, and who are being held responsible for their actions, and that is what is appropriate in this case," Mr. Harper said Thursday in Lac-Mégantic, Que.

Asked whether there would be disciplinary action against Mr. Gerstein, Mr. Harper's director of communications, Jason MacDonald, said the party's "fund did not pay for Duffy's inappropriate expenses. Nigel Wright did." Court documents released Wednesday detailed what police say they've pieced together about the $90,000 payment so far. Mr. Wright and Mr. Duffy are under criminal investigation, but haven't been charged.

On Friday, Mr. Harper told reporters that neither or nor his office approved Mr. Gerstein's decision to approach Deloitte on this matter.

"No," Mr. Harper said during a visit to Winnipeg in answer to a direct question.

However, the newly released court records show that Mr. Gerstein told the Mounties that he discussed this matter with at least two officials in the PMO at the time, Mr. Wright and Patrick Rogers. After speaking to his contact at Deloitte, Mr. Gerstein was told that "the audit would continue" even if Mr. Duffy reimbursed these expenses. Mr. Gerstein relayed this information to the PMO, he said.

In his court filing, RCMP Corporal Greg Horton criticized some Conservative senators for their hazy memory and, in case of Carolyn Stewart Olsen, answers that are "not consistent with the facts." Ms. Stewart Olsen declined comment on Thursday, but two other senators fought back.

Marjory LeBreton, the government Senate leader at the time the Duffy saga was unfolding, rejected police allegations that she provided evidence contrary to what e-mails show.

Story continues below advertisement

"When I met with the RCMP, I answered all questions willingly, honestly and to the best of my ability," Ms. LeBreton told The Globe in a statement. "… I cannot answer for e-mails I was unaware of or e-mails where the claim to communicate certain information to me was not followed through on."

Police also detailed an interview with David Tkachuk, a Conservative senator who chaired the subcommittee overseeing the audit of Mr. Duffy's expenses. He called the police document, which said he couldn't recall several details, "a work of fiction."

"This [court filing] is what I call a political document by the police to get further information. So they're going to gussy it up a little bit. It's a work of fiction. There's no proof to any of the allegations they make," Mr. Tkachuk said. RCMP are seeking his e-mails, which he says he'll provide.

Mr. Tkachuk reiterated he knew nothing about Mr. Wright's cheque, and that the Prime Minister's Office, of course, had a role in dealing with such a major issue.

Other senators, including Mr. Gerstein, declined comment. Asked about the latest developments, the Senate's current Conservative leader, Claude Carignan, told reporters he'd "prefer to let the RCMP do its job."

Deloitte defended its actions in this case, saying an "ethical wall" was put up to avoid any interference in the process – and that Mr. Gerstein's call to Deloitte partner Michael Runia didn't violate that. "No information related to the audit was provided to anyone who was not entitled to receive the information," a spokesperson said. Retired RCMP officer Garry Clement said any attempt to interfere with the Deloitte audit was a risky move for anyone in Ottawa. "Unfortunately, they tried to hide and cover it up … rather that just allowing the course of justice to take its normal route," he said in an interview.

Story continues below advertisement

Forensic auditor Al Rosen said auditors are regularly approached by people seeking to influence their work, and that Deloitte reacted appropriately by insulating staff working on the Senate file. "This goes on all the time," he said.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies