Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Harper's omnibus bill is a product of the democratic process

In the end, both sides got the job done.

Now that the Speaker has limited the opposition attempt at a filibuster, the Tories' omnibus bill should clear Parliament this week or next. The Harper government's agenda remains intact.

But the NDP, Liberals and Greens succeeded in raising the alarm. Anyone following Canadian politics must surely know the plethora of changes to a host of acts contained in the bill.

Story continues below advertisement

If omnibus bills are increasingly a fact of life in federal and provincial parliaments, so too is effective opposition to them. The system is far from perfect, but the system adapts.

"It's regrettable" that the Conservatives are pushing through such a large bill, said Jean-François Godbout, a parliamentary scholar at the University of Montreal. But "if they're not doing anything illegal, we can't really blame them for getting their agenda across."

Consider the alternative. If the opposition had succeeded in their attempt to force the Conservatives to break their budget bill into four or five parts, debate on much of it would not have begun until the fall. Final votes would typically not have occurred until spring, 2013, at the earliest.

The bills would probably have been better for such consideration. Flaws would have been caught and fixed. But the government's agenda would have been delayed by a year or more, with future priorities pushed back to 2014.

By forcing this bill through now, the Conservatives have given themselves a clean slate for the fall sitting. Whatever Stephen Harper has planned – changes to equalization? to public-sector union contracts? – there will now be plenty of time to implement it.

Governments like omnibus bills because they can shove a raft of controversial measures into one package and force them through early in a mandate and repair any political damage before the next election.

Champions of the democratic process despair over such bills, because they subvert Parliament's duty to examine the government's agenda and hold it to account.

Story continues below advertisement

But we had an election on exactly this issue last year. The Liberals and NDP campaigned on the Tories' shoddy treatment of Parliament. The Conservatives campaigned on protecting the economy.

A large plurality of voters chose the Conservatives. That system isn't perfect, either. But it's what we've got. The omnibus is the result, for good and for ill.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author

John Ibbitson started at The Globe in 1999 and has been Queen's Park columnist and Ottawa political affairs correspondent.Most recently, he was a correspondent and columnist in Washington, where he wrote Open and Shut: Why America has Barack Obama and Canada has Stephen Harper. He returned to Ottawa as bureau chief in 2009. More


The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

Please note that our commenting partner Civil Comments is closing down. As such we will be implementing a new commenting partner in the coming weeks. As of December 20th, 2017 we will be shutting down commenting on all article pages across our site while we do the maintenance and updates. We understand that commenting is important to our audience and hope to have a technical solution in place January 2018.

Discussion loading… ✨