Skip to main content

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper speaks at a news conference in Richmond Hill, Ontario, January 30, 2015.

Mark Blinch/The Globe and Mail

Canada is the only member of the "Five Eyes" intelligence-sharing alliance that does not have legislative oversight of its security agencies. Here is how the other countries call on legislators to hold their spies to account:

United Kingdom

The nine members of the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament – drawn from the House of Commons and the House of Lords – have access to highly classified information in their work. They offer oversight of the government's operational and intelligence activities, producing one annual report but also special reports into terrorist attacks or controversies involving spy agencies.

Story continues below advertisement

United States

The U.S. President keeps Congress "fully and currently informed" on the country's intelligence activities, through the senior leadership of the 22-member House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the 15-member Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

The Senate committee showcased its reach and impact with its report into CIA torture practices in December, 2014.

Australia

The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security is composed of 11 MPs and senators, who can review the budgets and expenditures of the country's six intelligence agencies, and carry out specific reviews as determined by the government or Parliament.

It is currently reviewing legislation dealing with retention of data by telecommunications firms.

New Zealand

Story continues below advertisement

The Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament is made up of the Prime Minister, as well as two government and two opposition MPs. The committee looks into the policies and expenditures of the country's two main intelligence agencies, analyzes legislation dealing with intelligence issues and can look into specific matters at the Prime Minister's request.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter