Skip to main content

Brian Gallant addresses a news conference in Fredericton Wednesday. His officials are collecting names of those who might agree to serve on a committee to look at how to make it easier for women to have abortions.

James West/THE CANADIAN PRESS

New Brunswick's premier-designate, Brian Gallant, who publicly declared his pro-choice stand in a province that restricts women's access to abortion, is moving quickly to remove those barriers.

His officials are already collecting names, including doctors and human-rights experts, of those who might agree to serve on a committee to look at how to make it easier for women to have abortions.

A senior Gallant strategist says the premier-designate wants to deal with this issue "swiftly and cleanly" – "just get it behind [us] fast," the strategist added.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Gallant, a 32-year-old lawyer, and his Liberals defeated the Progressive Conservative government, winning 27 of 49 seats on Monday after the 32-day campaign. His government will be sworn in within two weeks. Only eight female MLAs were elected – four each for the Liberals and Conservatives.

But that is a step up for the Liberals, who had no women in their previous caucus. New Brunswick has one of the lowest percentages of representation by women in its legislature in the country.

The abortion issue, if not dealt with quickly, is one that will continue to stalk him as it did during the election campaign. Although it does not appear he was punished by voters for his pro-choice position – some of the ridings where anti-abortion literature was distributed elected Liberal MLAs – it is an issue that can be a huge distraction, especially for a new government that has promised to move on job creation.

However, the abortion issue blew up even before the election campaign after the closing in July of the Morgentaler Clinic in Fredericton. It performed 60 per cent of the abortions in the province – or 600 a year.

A regulation, brought in 25 years ago by a previous Liberal premier, Frank McKenna, requires that a woman get the approval of two doctors to receive a medically funded abortion. In addition, only two hospitals in the province perform the procedure – often forcing women to travel from their communities.

Successive governments, both Progressive Conservative and Liberal, wouldn't touch the politically charged issue, despite calls for the regulation to be repealed.

Mr. Gallant has adopted federal Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau's position that Liberal MPs support pro-choice policies. Mr. Gallant's MLAs will also be compelled to support women's rights, including the right to choose to have an abortion.

Story continues below advertisement

Repealing the contentious regulation does not require a vote in the legislature. It can be repealed by cabinet. During the campaign, pro-choice advocates called for Mr. Gallant to immediately repeal the regulation. They were not satisfied with his position that he look at, not just the regulation, but all barriers to women's reproductive rights, such as funding, or how to recruit more doctors to the province.

Kathleen Pye, of Reproductive Justice NB, says "we are really happy that in one of his first addresses he is talking about this."

"It's obviously a really concerning issue and needs to be addressed right away," she said, reiterating her view that the regulation needs to be repealed immediately.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter