Skip to main content

Canada's Industry Minister James Moore speaks during a news conference in Ottawa February 19, 2014.

CHRIS WATTIE/REUTERS

After signing trade deals with South Korea and the European Union, the Harper government is turning its attention to dismantling the protectionist barriers that exist between provinces and cost the Canadian economy as much as $49-billion annually.

Federal Industry Minister James Moore begins a cross-country speaking tour Tuesday to drum up support among consumers, businesses and provincial politicians for efforts to overhaul the 20-year-old agreement on internal trade. His road trip has a six-city itinerary from Vancouver to Halifax with more stops planned for July and August.

Interprovincial trade barriers thwart Canadians and companies when they try to do business outside their home province or territory. They inhibit sales of wine, block workers from freely crossing provincial boundaries and restrict who can bid for government contracts, among other things.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Moore said it's frustrating to note that once the Canada-European Union free trade deal is signed, entrepreneurs from Germany, for instance, will have more unhindered access to municipal and provincial government procurement markets in a given region than Canadians from elsewhere in the country.

"We need to have more free trade within Canada," the Industry Minister said in an interview, adding his speaking tour aims to recruit more Canadians "at the ground level" to the cause.

Mr. Moore is treading where many previous industry ministers have tried, and failed, to make headway. These trade barriers exist because provincial politicians are sheltering local industries.

However, the minister said he believes there's been a rare meeting of the minds between Ottawa and the provinces on the need to do something "bold and aggressive to beat down barriers to trade."

The 1994 Agreement on Internal Trade was a deal for an earlier age, he said.

"It was written in a time when Canada had a free trade agreement with two countries in the world: the United States and Mexico. Now we have [deals with] 43 and we need to modernize it."

Mr. Moore and his provincial counterparts are gathering in Manitoba in August to try to come up with a new internal trade agreement.

Story continues below advertisement

"We have co-operation across all partisan and regional lines, frankly for the first time in 20 years, to do something concrete and substantive and I am very hopeful that we will be able to do something that will have lasting benefit for Canadians," he said.

From coast to coast, regardless of whether their partisan affiliation is Liberal, Conservative or NDP, he said, provinces appear ready to deal.

One of the drawbacks of existing rules on interprovincial trade barriers is what critics have called a toothless dispute settlement mechanism.

Mr. Moore said he'd like to see a revised deal include a binding means of settling disagreements between provinces.

The minister says he's particularly heartened by the willingness of the new federalist Liberal government in Quebec to participate in efforts to broaden internal trade across Canada.

Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard and his new Economy Minister Jacques Daoust "have both been very open and sincere about their desire to build economic links with the rest of the country so Quebec can see the benefits of being in the Canadian family and prospering within Canada," Mr. Moore said.

Story continues below advertisement

The minister said he would like to see a revised internal agreement that is premised on the idea all internal trade should move freely with only exceptions to this rule being listed.

"Rather than saying this particular product or this particular kind of labour or resource can freely move around the country, I think the default position should be [to] liberalize all trade within Canada."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter