Skip to main content

NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair is pictured as attends the launch of his new autobiography, "Strength of Conviction", in Montreal on Monday, August 10, 2015.

Ryan Remiorz/The Canadian Press

Canada needs credible, sustainable development laws before it can determine whether or not to significantly expand production of the Alberta oil sands, NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair said Monday.

Mulcair was speaking at a campaign stop and book launch event in Montreal, not long after being interrupted at a similar event in Toronto by protesters who pressed him for a position on TransCanada's Energy East pipeline.

Federal party leaders have not taken a firm position on Energy East because the proposed project is currently under review and Canadians are divided on whether or not to expand oil sands production and build pipelines or gradually reduce oil exports to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

Story continues below advertisement

Both Mulcair and Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau have said they don't trust the current federal pipeline review process and would introduce what they call stricter and more thorough analyses of proposed energy projects.

"It's possible" to develop and increase production of the oil sands while being serious about greenhouse gas reduction, the NDP leader said.

"You have to put in place that sustainable development legislation and enforce it."

That includes pricing pollution into oil products and making polluters pay for the pollution they create, "and that type of thing has to be done to determine whether or not you can continue at the same level (of oil sands production)," he added.

The NDP has been under pressure to clarify its position on the Alberta oil sands after Toronto NDP candidate and author Linda McQuaig told a CBC panel that curbing production might be necessary for Canada to meet its environmental targets.

The Tories committed Canada to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 30 per cent from 2005 levels before 2030.

Neither the NDP, the Liberals nor the Conservatives have outlined exactly how Canada can expand the oilsands — a major driver of the country's economy — and commit to reducing emissions at the same time.

Story continues below advertisement

Many anti-oil-sands activists point to a January 2015 peer-reviewed, academic article in the journal Nature that said about two-thirds of the world's fossil fuel reserves — including the oil sands — must remain unburned by 2050 in order to limit global warming to 2 degrees C.

Mulcair was in Toronto and reading passages from his newly released autobiography, "Strength of Conviction," when a couple of people stood up to unfurl banners in front of him, shouting, "Stop Energy East."

The project would bring 1.1 million barrels of oil a day from Alberta and Saskatchewan to refineries in New Brunswick for export overseas.

"If it is found to be incompatible with national action on climate change, will you say no to the pipeline?" one protester yelled as he was escorted out of the room by Mulcair's security detail.

"Of course we will," Mulcair replied. "That's what the whole purpose of coming in with a new system is: to make sure that we take into account climate change whenever we analyze a project."

The disruption was brief and relatively amicable; at least one of the protesters reappeared during the book-signing portion of Mulcair's event to pose for a photo with the NDP leader.

Story continues below advertisement

A couple of people in Montreal also wanted to disrupt Mulcair's launch by asking questions about Energy East, but they were unsuccessful.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter