Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Oliver says he will study income-splitting pledge

Joe Oliver leaves Rideau Hall after being sworn in as the finance minister Wednesday March 19, 2014 in Ottawa.


New federal finance minister Joe Oliver isn't tipping his hand yet on how the Tories will proceed with a controversial pledge to allow parents to split income for tax relief.

That's a departure from predecessor Jim Flaherty, who voiced public misgivings about the fairness of a lucrative income splitting tax cut for families that particularly targets households with stay-at-home spouses. "We're going to be guided by our platform," Mr. Oliver told The Globe and Mail in an interview.

He suggested that the pledge is still open to adjustments. The March 2011 promise made by the Tories would allow couples with children under 18 to split up to $50,000 of their income each year for tax purposes – reducing what the household would pay Canada Revenue Agency. It was to take effect when the federal budget is balanced, now forecast for 2015.

Story continues below advertisement

"This is a complex issue and I'm going to get into the details of it," Mr. Oliver said.

Mr. Oliver added: "With that basic principle in mind, I'll be taking a look at this issue in all its complexity."

An internal debate within the Conservative government has begun over the 2011 election pledge, a niche tax break that's been official Tory policy for more than eight years.

Mr. Flaherty drew this debate out into the open last month when he questioned the fairnesss of this relatively narrowly cast political pledge. According to the C.D. Howe Institute, 85 per cent of Canadian households would gain nothing from the measure.

Employment Minister Jason Kenney is one of several cabinet ministers, including Treasury Board President Tony Clement, who have made it clear they believe the Conservatives should make good on their promise.

The challenge for the Tories is reaching a consensus on how to proceed without alienating key supporters. Income splitting has tremendous symbolic significance for some Conservatives who are upset about what they consider a bias in Canada's tax system against stay-at-home spouses. It became party policy in 2005.

Government sources have previously said the pledge could be trimmed to make it less generous a tax break or to modify it in other ways. That's because, as written, the promise would eat up close to half the projected budget surplus but deliver insufficient political benefits – with an impact felt by less than two million households. Such a rewrite of the promise would mean the Tories would be fulfilling the spirit of the pledge if not the letter of it.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Harper has already made it clear he hasn't forgotten the campaign pledge.

"As I said during the election campaign, we think income splitting would be an excellent policy for Canadian families," the Prime Minister told MPs, noting the government has already enacted the policy for seniors.

The measure was projected to cost $2.5-billion but benefit 1.8 million households – saving these families $1,300 on average, the Tories said. Sources say with the passing of time the cost would now be closer to $2.7-billion.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Authors
Parliamentary reporter

Steven Chase has covered federal politics in Ottawa for The Globe since mid-2001, arriving there a few months before 9/11. He previously worked in the paper's Vancouver and Calgary bureaus. Prior to that, he reported on Alberta politics for the Calgary Herald and the Calgary Sun, and on national issues for Alberta Report. More

Parliamentary reporter

A member of the Parliamentary Press Gallery since 1999, Bill Curry worked for The Hill Times and the National Post prior to joining The Globe in Feb. 2005. Originally from North Bay, Ont., Bill reports on a wide range of topics on Parliament Hill, with a focus on finance. More


The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨