Skip to main content

Politics Judge rebukes Toews for rejecting yet another convict's transfer request

Public Safety Minister Vic Toews announces the Conservative government's decision to shut down two prisons at an Ottawa news conference on April 19, 2012.

Sean Kilpatrick/Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press

The Federal Court of Appeal has ruled that Public Safety Minister Vic Toews didn't give adequate reasons when he rejected a bid by a Montreal trucker jailed in the United States to serve the rest of his sentence back in Canada.

The judgment is the 15th time a Canadian federal court has criticized Mr. Toews or his two Conservative predecessors, Peter Van Loan and Stockwell Day, for failing to provide a proper explanation why they wouldn't allow a Canadian held in a foreign prison to be transferred to their country of citizenship.

The court ordered Mr. Toews to review again the application by Yves LeBon, saying that the minister's rejection was "neither transparent nor intelligible."

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. LeBon was intercepted by an Illinois state trooper for a minor traffic violation in 2007. A search of his car trunk uncovered 119 kilos of cocaine. He is now serving a 10-year sentence at a minimum-security penitentiary in Pennsylvania. American authorities approved his request to be transferred to Canada three years ago.

The Correctional Service of Canada told Mr. Toews the available information "does not lead one to believe that [Mr. LeBon]would, after the transfer, commit an act of terrorism or organized crime."

Mr. Toews, however, turned down the application, citing Mr. LeBon's refusal to reveal for whom he was transporting such a large amount of cocaine.

The minister's decision was upheld in Federal Court but rejected by the appeals court in an April 27 decision that hadn't been reported until now.

"Because the minister's decision was not justified, transparent and intelligible it was unreasonable and so it should be set aside," Madam Justice Eleanor Dawson wrote for the three-judge appellate panel.

Lawyers who have dealt with transfer cases say that requests used to be almost automatically granted. However, under the Conservative government, about a third are systemically rejected, usually those dealing with drug offences.

Often, the minister's rejections come despite assessments by Correctional Service of Canada that the applicants were at a low risk of reoffending.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Toews cannot comment on specific cases.

However, when asked to comment about the policy in general, his office said in a statement that "at all times and in all decisions, the minister puts public safety first."

Under the International Transfer of Offenders Act, the public safety minister makes the final decision over whether to allow Canadians convicted abroad to serve the remainder of their sentences in Canada.

Amendments to the law passed under the Conservative omnibus crime bill will give the minister more discretion in deciding the cases. However, Mr. LeBon's case went to court under the old law.

A transfer to Canada is advantageous to inmates because generally they qualify for parole earlier than if they were in custody abroad.

However, lawyers and advocates say that it is also better to have applicants back within the Canadian correctional system where they would be registered and eventually released under supervision.

Story continues below advertisement

Otherwise, they say, offenders can serve their whole sentences abroad with little access to rehabilitation programs and be returned without notification to authorities in Canada.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter