Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

The question of random breath testing has been a topic of discussion at federal, provincial and territorial meetings, a spokeswoman for Peter MacKay said.

Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press

Canada's Justice Minister says he is looking at ways to expand roadside checks in an effort to deter more people from drinking and driving.

In an interview with The Globe and Mail, Peter MacKay said his department is looking at measures that could allow police to demand random breath tests from drivers – even in circumstances where there are no grounds to believe a particular driver is impaired.

"We've been taking a very broad examination throughout the summer, my department has, at what other jurisdictions have done," Mr. MacKay said. "And we're always mindful, always have in the backdrop the need to respect people's rights. But a lot of emphasis is on protecting the public here given the prevalence of impaired driving."

Story continues below advertisement

Under current laws, police have the right to stop any vehicle at random and question the driver's sobriety. If there are reasonable grounds to suspect the person has been drinking, police can also demand a breath test to assess that person's blood-alcohol level.

Mr. MacKay said he would look at "expanding that ability" to do roadside checks. Asked whether that could mean expanding an officer's ability to demand a breath test, Mr. MacKay said it did.

"I think you're going to see, in my view, the need to revisit that issue [of random checks]. Other jurisdictions have gone that route to significant effect," he said. Australia, New Zealand and some European countries allow random breath tests.

A spokeswoman for Mr. MacKay later said the question of random breath testing has been a "regular topic of discussion" at federal, provincial and territorial meetings, and a working group was formed to examine Criminal Code provisions with respect to repeat offenders. "While we are aware of recommendations from various stakeholders with respect to random breath testing, unfortunately there is currently no consensus among provinces and territories for this policy proposal," Jennifer Gearey wrote in an e-mail.

Mothers Against Drunk Driving Canada published a news release on its website this summer asking Mr. MacKay to implement random breath testing at the federal level. Andrew Murie, the organization's chief executive officer, said he believes a law requiring people to submit to random breath tests could reduce impairment-related deaths and injuries by 20 per cent each year.

He said the goal of the program would be to deter more people from driving under the influence of alcohol. "It's not about catching [more people], in fact we would catch way less. People do not want to get caught drinking and driving. And with random tests, the threat of being charged is much greater," Mr. Murie said.

The idea has not won universal praise, however. Abby Deshman, who directs the public safety program for the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, said that any legislation mandating random breath checks would likely trigger a constitutional challenge. "While there's no doubt that drinking and driving and impaired driving are serious concerns, we do question whether [giving] additional randomized power to the police would be effective in decreasing drinking and driving further," she said.

Story continues below advertisement

Conservative MP Peter Goldring, who was found not guilty earlier this year of refusing to provide a breath sample, said he is already concerned that drivers can face criminal charges if they refuse to take a roadside breath test – despite the fact that those tests cannot be used as evidence in court. Instead, Mr. Goldring said he would like to see criminal charges applied only to those who refuse a test that would meet evidentiary standards, such as those currently conducted in central police stations. Moving toward random breath testing, said the MP for Edmonton East, would go too far. "That's my civil right," he said. "Have some suspicion that I'm doing something wrong. Use your policing skills and your training."

Related topics

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies