Skip to main content

Parliament Hill in Ottawa on June 8, 2016.

Blair Gable/The Globe and Mail

Liberal MP Denis Paradis thinks it sounds obvious enough: Canada is an officially bilingual country, so its national capital should be too.

"I do think that it would be a good thing that Ottawa shows that there are two official languages in the country," Paradis, who represents the Quebec riding of Brome-Missisquoi, said in an interview.

That's why he would like to raise the idea with colleagues on the House of Commons standing committee on official languages, which he chairs, when MPs return to Parliament Hill next week.

Story continues below advertisement

The notion of making Ottawa officially bilingual — which Paradis says would not involve changing any federal laws — is one that has come and gone and come again over the decades.

It has sparked passionate debates between those who want stronger protections for the rights of the minority French-speaking community in Ottawa and those who fear it would cost too much and further restrict access to jobs in a city where bilingualism is already a frequent requirement for a job in the federal government.

Paradis said he was inspired to discuss the proposal with the committee this fall in part because it was long championed by Mauril Belanger, a Liberal MP from Ottawa who died this summer following a battle with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or ALS, commonly known as Lou Gehrig's disease.

The City of Ottawa has had a bilingualism policy since 2001, which says the municipality recognizes both English and French as having the same rights, status and privileges.

It's the reason why Ottawa Mayor Jim Watson has long opposed officially changing the status, arguing the city is already bilingual.

A group called Movement for an Officially Bilingual Capital of Canada wants the municipal council to ask the Ontario legislature to change the City of Ottawa Act so that it officially recognizes the bilingual character and status of the city as the national capital, which they argue would essentially enshrine the status quo in law.

Added Alain Dupuis, vice-president of the Association des communautes francophones d'Ottawa, one of the organizations behind the proposal: "We are not asking for a federal-type officially bilingual city where you would have to have X number of jobs designated or reserved. Let's just make sure that future generations can enjoy the same level of services that we have now."

Story continues below advertisement

Beth Trudeau, member of a group called Canadians for Language Fairness, nonetheless strongly opposed any change.

"Ask (Ottawa residents) if they (want) such an unnecessary added expense to their tax bill," she wrote in an email, pointing out the call for a bilingual Ottawa does not include bringing bilingualism to Gatineau, Que., the other city that makes up the National Capital Region.

New Democrat MP Francois Choquette, vice-chair of the official languages committee, said he would support Paradis in his efforts, but added he really wants to hear from Heritage Minister Melanie Joly, who is also minister responsible for official languages.

"She is the one who should be showing leadership on wanting to have Ottawa be bilingual."

Joly has decided to stay out of it, with her office saying Thursday that while official languages and supporting minority communities are a priority for the Liberal government, any decisions about bilingualism in Ottawa belong to the municipal and Ontario governments.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter