Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

The Canada Revenue Agency headquarters in Ottawa.

Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press

A long-time Liberal backroom strategist failed to disclose her troubles with the Canada Revenue Agency before she became a special assistant to Transport Minister Marc Garneau, a lapse that wasn't picked up in the security clearance vetting process.

Heather Chiasson, a former senior Liberal Party official and key adviser to several Liberal leaders, was fined $11,000 in 2013 for failing to report income over three taxation years. Her appeal was dismissed by Justice Johanne D'Auray of the Tax Court of Canada in May, 2014.

Mr. Garneau told The Globe and Mail that he was unaware of Ms. Chiasson's income tax problems when he hired her in January to handle appointments and to run the Atlantic desk in his office.

Story continues below advertisement

"I am being very honest with you and tell you that I am learning something that I am not aware of, so I will have to look into it," he said on Wednesday.

Ms. Chiasson said in an interview that she never raised the issue during the federal government's security check or with Mr. Garneau because she felt the issue had been resolved.

"There were no taxes owed, but they [the CRA] said, you guys are really sloppy. We now can penalize you because you have done this three times," she said. "None of this was intentional. Was it sloppy on my part? Absolutely, and we felt a penalty of $11,000 was too high and we went to the Tax Court and said, this is not fair. That was not a pleasant experience and they said it might not be fair, but that's what the rules are."

However, in May of last year, Ms. Chiasson said the Canada Revenue Agency cancelled the $11,000 fine as a result of a budget change, which removed penalties for people who are sloppy in filing their income taxes. Ms. Chiasson applied for "taxpayer relief" after the budget changes and did not have to pay a fine.

"It was resolved. So there was nothing to raise. It was all resolved," Ms. Chiasson said in explaining why she never told Mr. Garneau or the Privy Council officials who did the security vetting.

NDP MP Murray Rankin questioned Ms. Chiasson's judgment in not informing Mr. Garneau, but he said it raises the more serious issue about how the government is screening political staffers.

"It shows a remarkable negligence on the part the government for doing a check that would include such things as this. It makes me very nervous about the extent to which they vet their employees," he said. "To not do it makes me ask questions about what else they are not checking in the vetting process."

Story continues below advertisement

Conservative MP Tony Clement said government security officials could have looked up Ms. Chaisson's name on the Internet, and the Tax Court judgment against her would have appeared.

"It makes me wonder about how many other cases we don't know about yet and whether they should restart the vetting process to make sure they haven't missed anyone else," Mr. Clement said.

The Canada Revenue Agency ruled in 2013 that Ms. Chaisson failed to report income for the taxation years 2007, 2009 and 2011. While working for the Federal Liberal Agency of Canada in 2007, she didn't report income of $5,011. In the fall of 2009, she went to work for then-Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff and failed to report $9,832.

In reporting income for 2011, Ms. Chiasson omitted to report employment income of $67,599 from the government as an employee of the Liberal leader's parliamentary office. She also omitted to report a retiring allowance in the amount of $4,216.

Ms. Chiasson, whose husband, Edmond, is also a Liberal activist, was the Nova Scotia co-chair of Jean Chrétien's 1990 leadership campaign. A former nurse, she has worked in senior roles for the Liberal Party, including most recently as director of election readiness for the 2015 election.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies