Skip to main content

Progressive Conservative Candidate Gila Martow (L) and her son, Mitch when arriving to vote for the Thornhill by-election at Wilshire Elementary School in Thornhill, Ontario January 13, 2014.

Fernando Morales/The Globe and Mail

Gila Martow's Progressive Conservative campaign team was ready to ring in another victory on election night last week at the Riviera Parque in Concord, Ont. They had ordered a hot buffet spread from The Harvest Room, a kosher catering service in Ms. Martow's riding, to feed 100 volunteers; set up a cash bar that offered a free glass of kosher wine for revellers; and spent hours decorating the room.

By the end of the night, most of the food was in the garbage and Ms. Martow was consoling her volunteers. The race in the provincial riding of Thornhill proved to be the tightest in the province and Ms. Martow lost by 85 votes to Liberal Sandra Yeung Racco.

But less than 24 hours later, Ms. Martow was in the mood to celebrate again. After an official tabulation of votes, Elections Ontario officials said Ms. Martow had actually received 85 votes more than Ms. Yeung Racco.

Story continues below advertisement

A data entry error on election night had given the seat to a Liberal instead of Progressive Conservative. The incumbent MPP had retained her seat and celebrated by ordering four large pizzas to her house Saturday evening.

On election night, ballots were counted at each polling station and reported by telephone by Elections Ontario officials. But during the process of official tabulation, which occurs in every riding, the Returning Officer reviewed the formally documented results from all the polls in Thornhill and determined a clerical error was made on election night. It turned out 21,868 ballots had been cast for Ms. Martow and 21,783 had been cast for Ms. Yeung Racco.

"This doesn't happen often at all," said Andrew Willis, communications co-ordinator for Elections Ontario. He said the tabulation process is a safeguard meant to catch these kinds of minor data-entry errors.

Ms. Martow's campaign manager called Ms. Martow Friday evening and asked her if she was sitting down.

"My first thought was, 'Oh my goodness, we've been fined,'" Ms. Martow said. "She says, 'You won.' "

Meanwhile, Ms. Yeung Racco has suggested she is not ready to accept defeat.

"We are alarmed at the number of what Elections Ontario deemed to be 'transposition and minor clerical errors' that led to this decision," Ms. Yeung Racco said in a statement posted to her campaign website. "When the results are as close as they were, it is imperative to ensure that every vote was counted properly."

Story continues below advertisement

She wrote that her team will be seeking a judicial recount, in which all ballots are counted again under the supervision of a judge.

Elections Ontario automatically hold judicial recounts in ridings where the race was won by 25 ballots or fewer, but candidates can also request them.

Ms. Martow said she doesn't think anyone at Elections Ontario should be punished or investigated for the error, but suggested that it might be wise to hold off on calling a winner until official tabulations in races where margins are as tight as hers.

"Somebody actually sent me the picture of the newspaper headline, 'Dewey defeats Truman,'" she said, referring to the infamous banner headline in the Chicago Tribune the day after Harry Truman unexpectedly defeated Thomas E. Dewey in the 1948 presidential election.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies