Skip to main content

Canada's Families, Children and Social Development Minister Jean-Yves Duclos speaks in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Dec. 9, 2015.

CHRIS WATTIE/REUTERS

The federal minister in charge of employment insurance says he wants to hear from Canadians before making any changes to benefits that could have far-reaching implications for new parents and those caring for an ailing loved one.

It will only be for four weeks, but the online consultations launched Thursday may open the door for Canadians who want more changes to the benefits system beyond what the Liberals put in their campaign platform.

That could include, as Liberal MP Mark Gerretsen has already proposed, allowing pregnant women in dangerous or challenging jobs to start taking their 15 weeks of maternity leave before they give birth. Or retooling a barely-used program aimed at giving financial help to the parents of murdered or missing children.

Story continues below advertisement

Social Development Minister Jean-Yves Duclos said it is all on the table as the Liberals focus on finalizing a plan by the 2017 budget.

"We want to take a few more weeks — and that's little time, I think, in the context of this important and broad social agenda to make — to make things right, to do things right," Duclos said.

Conservative MP Blake Richards cited the case of a family in his Alberta riding who lost their four-month-old to sudden infant death syndrome, only to be cut off from parental benefits and ordered to repay a portion of their EI payments.

"Families are not even aware that this is the case," said Richards, who plans to push families to tell the government to close the loophole. "We need to be showing a bit more compassion here."

Richards said he hoped the government would take the issue into account when crafting a new policy.

The consultations, which started Thursday, will look at the Liberal campaign promise to expand parental leave and compassionate care benefits to Canadians who care for a family member. The four-week period will give employers, workers, provinces, and experts a chance to make policy recommendations.

Duclos said the government's goal is to have the details of changes in place by next year's federal budget.

Story continues below advertisement

The Liberals promised during the election campaign to extend parental leave under the employment insurance system to 18 months from 12. The new system wouldn't have a similar increase in benefits. The Liberal campaign platform estimated the plan would cost $125 million a year in 2017 and 2018.

Critics of the plan say such a system would only benefit those women and families who have enough resources to cover expenses during a year where one or both parents have less income. As well, research suggests that the more time women take on maternity leave, the less likely they are to return to full-time work.

The government has hinted at other things it is interested in doing within the parental leave system, including having dedicated paternity leave, similar to what is already available to new fathers in Quebec.

On the compassionate care front, the Liberals estimated it would cost $585 million over the next three years to expand eligibility for the benefit, and let those eligible claim the six-month benefit incrementally over a one-year period.

Asked why the Liberals were consulting on promises outlined in the election, Duclos said the campaign pledges were both specific and broad in that they didn't prescribe policy details.

He said the government wants to make sure employment insurance benefits match the needs and realities of today's families.

Story continues below advertisement

"Our society is changing rapidly. We want to make sure that our EI system adapts to those changes," Duclos said.

"And before we make relatively vast and important changes to that EI system, we want to make sure we have had an opportunity to engage with Canadians."

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies