Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Liberals’ two-year plan for infrastructure spending set to take five years: documents

Minister of Infrastructure and Communities Amarjeet Sohi responds to a question in the House of Commons on May 31, 2017.


Late last year, officials warned that a federal spending spree to repair crumbling roads and water systems could take three years longer than expected to complete, based on internal documents outlining issues with the first tranche of cash in the government's infrastructure program.

The Liberals had originally hoped to have cities and provinces complete $5.4-billion in transit and water system work by this March, but quickly realized that more time was needed.

A "secret" fall briefing note to Infrastructure Minister Amarjeet Sohi, obtained by The Canadian Press through the Access to Information Act, says delays hampered a large number of construction projects, requiring that the deadline be extended as far as March 2021.

Story continues below advertisement

The heavily blacked-out document predicted the majority of water and transit projects "would require extensions not only for a third year, but beyond into a fourth year (i.e. 2019-20) and fifth year (i.e. 2020-21)," referencing the federal fiscal years in brackets.

Sohi agreed to a blanket deadline extension to March 2020, turning what was to be a two-year stimulus program into a four-year plan.

He said the decision to grant extra time to 2020, instead of 2021, was based on the expected cash flow for projects and the ability for construction companies to handle all the extra work.

"This is not about that projects are being delayed, it's about taking a little longer to complete those projects or taking a little longer to have the buses manufactured because of construction and manufacturing capacity," Sohi said in an interview from Edmonton.

"From our perspective, we made a commitment to build and rebuild infrastructure and focus on the repairs in phase 1 and ... we are achieving the results we intended to achieve, but we also want to give flexibility."

As of Friday, the federal government had approved more than 3,400 water and transit projects with a combined federal contribution valued at almost $4.2-billion. Of that money, federal coffers had only doled out about $175.6-million to date, based on figures available on the Infrastructure Canada website.

Federal dollars flow once cities and provinces submit receipts for reimbursement, often creating a lag between when work takes place and when the federal money is spent.

Story continues below advertisement

In some cases, the federal government won't receive receipts until a project is completely done. In other cases, projects are delayed because of labour strife, bad weather or other factors beyond Ottawa's control.

The government says 793 projects representing about $1.8-billion in federal contributions have been granted individual extensions from Sohi. Between those extensions, and delays in filing expense claims, federal officials last year decided to shift more than $2-billion in planned spending to future years.

Provincial and municipal officials say that the time needed to go through the funding approval process contributed to the delays.

Having officials vet the details of each proposal before getting federal approval for funding meant some cities put off breaking ground until they knew federal funding would come their way.

"We heard loud and clear from some municipalities that they were struggling to meet two pieces of criteria: timeline requirements and a provision that would require municipalities to incur 60 per cent of their costs by March 31st, 2018," said Alex Benac, a spokesman for Ontario Infrastructure Minister Bob Chiarelli.

The extra time and removal of the local spending requirement, which Chiarelli asked for in September, has given cities "much-needed time to get shovels in the ground and keep their projects on track according to a more generous, achievable timeline," Benac said.

Story continues below advertisement

Federal and provincial officials say the lessons learned from the first phase of the program will be used in designing the second phase.

Both sides want funding agreements for the second, longer and more lucrative phase of infrastructure spending signed by March.

Report an error
As of December 20, 2017, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles as we switch to a new provider. We are behind schedule, but we are still working hard to bring you a new commenting system as soon as possible. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to