Skip to main content

Bill Sundhu a barrister and solicitor in Kamloops, B.C. at the Old Court House on Friday March 13, 2012.

jeff bassett The Globe and Mail

Minority lawyers, chafing at an overwhelming number of white appointees to federal judgeships, are mobilizing to press for a more transparent appointment process.

They accuse the government of concealing its poor record of minority appointments behind an intolerably opaque process.

"The demographics of the bench must be tracked and reported – who applies, and gets appointed and who makes the decisions," the Federation of Asian Canadian Lawyers said in a statement Friday.

Story continues below advertisement

"Almost every day that we are in court, we see the lack of minority representation staring back at us," the statement said. "Despite repeated calls for a judiciary that reflects the communities it services, our federal government has yet to respond."

The outcry follows a Globe and Mail review of superior court appointments over the past three and a half years. It revealed that of 100 new judges in provinces across the country, 98 were white.

Coming on the 30th anniversary of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms – a document that enshrines the rights of equality and diversity – the figures suggest that a central institution responsible for upholding and interpreting the country's laws is seriously lacking in diversity.

To obtain a glimpse of recent patterns, The Globe used Internet searches and culled information from judicial sources and law firms where judicial appointees worked. The Globe found two exceptions to the pattern – both Métis judges appointed in B.C. and Nova Scotia.

The FACL statement, prepared by directors Paul Jonathan Saguil and Immanuel Lanzaderas, noted that 14.6 per cent of B.C.'s legal profession and 9.6 per cent of Alberta lawyers are visible minorities. "Clearly, the federal bench does not even approach the diversity in the profession, let alone in the wider community," they said.

The writers derided those who claim that opening the judiciary to diverse communities would mean appointing "less meritorious" candidates. They said the line of argument is hard to swallow, in light of an appointment process that gives the government enormous flexibility to appoint whomever it chooses.

"The opaque and highly politicized process currently in place does little to ensure that the best lawyers, based on merit, are appointed to the bench," the statement said. "Moreover, there is nothing contradictory about diversity and merit."

Story continues below advertisement

It warned that the status quo will lead to an erosion in public confidence in the justice system – particularly in minority communities.

William Sundhu, a Canadian-born Sikh and former B.C. Provincial Court judge who has studied minority representation on the bench, said he received a flood of calls and e-mails after the Globe story from aboriginal lawyers and members of visible minorities all keen to see judges appointed who reflect the face of their communities.

"They want to believe the country and its judicial system will be truly based on fairness and that it will be better for their children," Mr. Sundhu said. "One aboriginal lawyer was quite emotional in speaking of his experience of the courts."

The theme they shared was that the issue is tremendously important, "and has been overlooked for too long," Mr. Sundhu said. "People were emotional about the importance of the issue because they have felt excluded, or less understood or valued, in their experience of the system and courts."

Mr. Saguil, a lawyer at Stockwoods LLP, said in an interview that the social media have been alive with comments and criticisms about the shortcomings of the federal appointment process.

"I think it's safe to say that everyone's pretty disappointed in this dismal state of affairs," he said. Mr. Saguil said that FACL is approaching other minority bar associations in hopes of creating a coalition that can approach the federal government with proposals to reform the judicial appointment process.

Story continues below advertisement

"From my perspective, this record is particularly interesting considering the pandering that the Conservative government has done towards minority groups, although I understand that this legacy carries over from previous Liberal governments as well," Mr. Saguil said.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter