Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Mixed messages on Mali have opposition pressing for clarity

Defence Minister Peter MacKay and Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird.


Contradictory messages from two Harper ministers about Canada's potential role in strife-torn Mali have drawn questions from the official opposition about who is in charge of the government's foreign policy.

Defence Minister Peter MacKay openly speculated on Sunday about Canadian troops training military officers in the West African desert country, similar to the Canadian mission taking place now in Afghanistan.

"We are contemplating what contribution Canada could make," he said, noting that training is something Canadian troops are "particularly adept at doing."

Story continues below advertisement

At the same time, Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird repeated that there will be no military mission in Mali, which is trying to regain its northern region from Islamist forces.

All of this has left the NDP's defence critic, Jack Harris, confused. He said Canadians need more clarity.

"It's not something that should be readily mused about publicly, particularly by the Minister of Defence when the Foreign Affairs Minister so strongly indicated that there is no military role for Canada," Mr. Harris said on Monday. "I just find it surprising that one minister would be so blatantly contradicting the Foreign Affairs Minister on such an important matter."

The Prime Minister's spokesman Andrew MacDougall dismissed any contradiction or split in the cabinet.

"The government's position is clear," he wrote in an email. "Canada is not contemplating a military mission in Mali."

He said Canada "applauds" the UN Security Council resolution passed in late December authorizing a one-year deployment of an African-led mission to help the Malian authorities take back the area "occupied by terrorists."

However, Mr. MacDougall added that Canada is "looking at ways to implement" the security council resolution's call "for support to regional and international efforts to address the situation in Mali."

Story continues below advertisement

It is also concerned that democracy return to the country after a coup last March.

Canada "stands ready" to assist, he said.

What that assistance will be – and whether the government believes a training mission is not a military mission – remains a mystery. Mr. MacDougall did not elaborate or answer those questions.

The NDP's Mr. Harris said it's clear that what Mr. MacKay is talking about would constitute a military mission.

"Mali is a situation where half the country is controlled by rebel forces, and clearly any activity there involving military assistance is a military mission," he said. "There is no doubt about that."

But, he noted that the UN resolution calls first for stability in the Mali government before any military intervention. It also calls for proper training of the military, which is notorious for human rights abuses.

Story continues below advertisement

Much more assessment must be done before Canada gets involved, he said. So far there has been no discussion in the House of Commons.

"Who is speaking for this government on foreign affairs," he asks. "Well, we don't know."

With a report from Geoffrey York

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
Ontario politics reporter

Jane Taber is a reporter at Queen’s Park. After spending three years reporting from the Atlantic, she has returned to Ontario and back to writing about her passion, politics. She spent 25 years covering Parliament Hill for the Ottawa Citizen, the National Post and the Globe and Mail. More


The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨