Skip to main content

Headquarters of Department of National Defence in Kanata, West of Ottawa. Montreal-based ITF Technologies conducted research with partners that included the Department of National Defence.

Francis Vachon/The Canadian Press Images

The Montreal high-tech firm at the centre of a foreign takeover by a Chinese investor that triggered national security concerns in Ottawa once participated in a research project with a Canadian spy agency and has sold equipment to the Department of National Defence.

The Trudeau government recently cancelled a Harper cabinet order for Hong Kong-based O-Net Communications to abandon its takeover of Montreal-based ITF Technologies. The Conservatives decided the ITF deal could be "injurious to national security" and tried to unwind it shortly before they lost power.

The Liberals have launched a "fresh review" of the transaction. Innovation Minister Navdeep Bains's office has declined to explain why, and referred all questions to his department, which said it could not comment for reasons of national security and commercial confidentiality.

Story continues below advertisement

Related: Liberals reverse Harper cabinet order to unwind Chinese takeover deal

The decision was made in November, 2016, just weeks after Mr. Trudeau visited China and then hosted Chinese Premier Li Keqiang on a visit to Canada.

ITF Technologies, formerly Avensys, is a leader in "fibre-laser" technology that is used in telecommunications, data communications and industrial applications. Its website indicates some of its products have military applications, but does not elaborate.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has made deepening trade relations with China, including a free-trade deal, key foreign-policy objectives and the Liberals are also loosening restrictions on outside investment. In November, Ottawa announced it would raise the threshold for automatic reviews of foreign takeovers to $1-billion two years ahead of schedule.

China, facing an uncertain economy, is attempting to keep its companies' investments at home.

Neither former Conservative government officials nor the Liberal government will elaborate on why the Tories ordered O-Net to abandon its purchase of ITF Technologies in July, 2015.

However, records show ITF has collaborated in cutting-edge university-level research on the science behind making messages more resistant to hacking – with affiliated partners that included Canada's eavesdropping spy agency, the Communications Security Establishment, as well as the National Research Council, Ottawa's chief research arm, and the Department of National Defence.

Story continues below advertisement

A review of photonic industry research between 2005 and 2009 shows CSE, the NRC and DND were affiliates, along with ITF, in a project that uses quantum cryptography to make advances in a field where experts try to produce coded messages that are difficult or impossible to crack. The research project concerned "absolutely secure optical fibre networks using quantum cryptography."

A CSE spokesman said the organization could not immediately answer questions about the project because it needed more time to research the matter.

Chinese government ownership may be part of what worried the Conservatives when they were in government. A corporation presentation prepared by O-Net in 2015 suggests that more than 25 per cent of its shares are owned by a company that is a subsidiary of Chinese state-owned China Electronics Corporation.

"Even a minority control by the Chinese government has to be considered as Beijing-controlled and any Canadian companies they might buy would be under their control," Conservative foreign affairs critic Peter Kent said in an interview on Thursday.

Mr. Kent said ITF's technology has military applications and to allow a company with a direct line to Beijing to acquire it is symptomatic of a "misguided rush to give the Chinese almost anything they ask for in the pursuit of trade."

When it was still named Avensys, the company sold more than $246,500 worth of high-tech equipment to the Department of National Defence, which also has a research arm, between 2005 and 2013. The NRC, through the Industrial Research Assistance Program, has also provided ITF with up to $169,500 for research and development.

Story continues below advertisement

Canada's allies are coming under more pressure at home to close the door to acquisitions in which the buyer is a state-owned enterprise in China. The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, a body set up to review the national security implications of trade with Beijing, has urged Congress to bar acquisitions by Chinese state-owned firms.

O-Net, which challenged the Harper cabinet order to divest itself of ITF, argued in court the deal is not a risk for Canada. "ITF … does not own any technologies that could be transferred to O-Net Communications that are not readily available in the marketplace," the company said in a court filing.

It said it acquired the ITF assets through an auction after the bankruptcy of its previous owner.

"There were no Canadian investors or investors from anywhere in North America that were willing to invest in ITF."

Briefing notes prepared for cabinet member Chrystia Freeland when she was trade minister show the Liberals are acutely aware of Beijing's unhappiness over the way Canadian authorities treat Chinese firms attempting takeovers.

"China has voiced concern over the existence of national security review provisions and their opacity under the Investment Canada Act, suggesting that China is unfairly targeted," the 2015 briefing book said.

Story continues below advertisement

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter