Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Syrian refugees wait for their names to be called for a UNHCR interview that will determine whether they are eligible for a second interview by the Canadian authorities in Amman Nov. 27, 2015.

Annie Sakkab

The cost of Canada's Syrian refugee program is expected to be put to a House of Commons vote during a brief sitting of Parliament next month.

The 338 newly elected members of Parliament are scheduled to return to Ottawa on Thursday for the first time since the October election.

The first order of business will be to elect a Speaker. A Throne Speech will follow on Friday. The House will then sit for five more days before adjourning Dec. 11.

Story continues below advertisement

In an interview with The Globe and Mail, Government House Leader Dominic LeBlanc outlined his plans for those five days.

While details have not yet been finalized, he said the government will likely introduce a spending item called supplementary estimates that will include the cost of Ottawa's refugee plans. The minister said the contents of the spending vote will be limited.

"It's not a voluminous thing," he said. "Our plan would be to table and then have approved the supplementary estimates. The main item, if not the only item, but certainly the only significant item, would be the spending plan for the Syrian refugee effort."

Given that the governing Liberals hold a majority of the seats in the new Parliament, votes on spending items are expected to pass easily.

Plans for the vote come as a new Nanos Research survey shows 65 per cent of Canadians either support or somewhat support the Liberal election pledge to accept 25,000 Syrian refugees.

The government recently said the Syrian refugee program will cost up to $678-million over six years. The Liberal platform had said its refugee promise would cost $250-million over three years.

Mr. LeBlanc said there will also be a separate vote that week to approve the government's promised income-tax changes for the 2016 tax year. The Liberals promised to reduce the tax rate on income between $44,701 and $89,401 from 22 per cent to 20.5 per cent. They also promised to introduce a new tax rate of 33 per cent on income earned above $200,000.

Story continues below advertisement

The content of that motion is expected to be limited to the party's promise on income taxes.

"The other [tax] measures would likely flow in a budget," Mr. LeBlanc said.

That likely means the motion will not include the party's pledge to reverse this year's near doubling of the maximum contribution Canadians can make each year to their tax free savings accounts .

The Liberals' promise to roll back the maximum annual TFSA contribution to $5,500 from $10,000 this year faced considerable opposition from seniors groups and other Canadians.

It is unclear whether the Liberals intend to have the new limit in place for Jan. 1, 2016. The platform said it would be in place during the 2016-17 fiscal year, which begins April 1, 2016. Tax changes normally apply to calendar years.

Mr. LeBlanc referred questions on that topic to Bill Morneau, however the Finance Minister was not available and his office declined comment.

Story continues below advertisement

"I would suggest that if there are any plans to change the rules surrounding the TFSA, the government should detail these as soon as possible," said Bank of Montreal chief economist Doug Porter, who added that he personally believes the promised change is unnecessary.

The parliamentary schedule also suggests the first Liberal budget is not imminent.

The government plans to get at least two committees running quickly and will ask the House of Commons finance committee to hold prebudget hearings in January and February.

Conservative finance critic Lisa Raitt said the government needs to explain the full financial impact of its promises, both in terms of what it means for families and what it means for Ottawa's long-term bottom line.

"All of these tax changes need to be presented in a bundle so that people can be prepared for their own budget changes at home," she said, noting that the Liberals also promised changes to family benefits and employment insurance premiums.

"If take-home pay is reduced, families need to know now," she said.

Story continues below advertisement

The Nanos Survey of 1,000 Canadians took place Nov. 21-24. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies