Skip to main content

NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair receives applause after asking a question during Question Period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Tuesday, Sept.23, 2014.

Adrian Wyld/THE CANADIAN PRESS

The Conservative government is refusing to say when Canada's military mission in Iraq is scheduled to end, sparking a standoff in the House of Commons that led NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair to question the neutrality of the Speaker.

Mr. Mulcair led off Question Period on Tuesday by asking when the Iraq mission would end – the government has said the initial deployment is for 30 days, but has ducked questions in the House on when that period actually began.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper didn't attend Tuesday's Question Period. His parliamentary secretary, Ontario MP Paul Calandra, responded to Mr. Mulcair with a series of questions and statements unrelated to Iraq, instead discussing Israel.

Story continues below advertisement

"I can understand the confusion. We are in the Middle East and under the I's, but we're talking about Iraq," Mr. Mulcair shot back. He asked a similar question, and Mr. Calandra once again evaded it.

"Mr. Speaker, there are rules in the book about Question Period. You are our arbiter. We ask you to enforce the rules on relevance [of answers]," Mr. Mulcair said.

The rules in the House of Commons Procedure and Practice handbook, however, say that the speaker "is not responsible for the quality or content of replies" and that "a minister's refusal to answer a question may not be questioned." Speaker Andrew Scheer, the Conservative MP whose nonpartisan role is to maintain order in the House of Commons, stuck by that.

Mr. Mulcair again persisted on the subject of Iraq, asking about whether an agreement outlining operating rules for Canadian Forces in Iraq had been completed, and when it would be public. Mr. Calandra again discussed Israel in response.

"Mr. Speaker, that does not speak very favourably about your neutrality on this House," Mr. Mulcair said. Mr. Scheer responded by simply calling on Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau to begin his questions – essentially revoking Mr. Mulcair's remaining scheduled questions.

After Question Period, Conservative MP James Bezan answered the question Mr. Calandra had avoided, telling reporters the 30-day window began on Sept. 5, but declined to answer other questions, citing national security interests.

Mr. Scheer said in a recent ruling that he plans to continue to respect the practice of "not intervening in respect of answers to questions" as Speaker.

Story continues below advertisement

After Question Period, Mr. Mulcair played down the exchange and avoided singling out Mr. Scheer and instead criticized Mr. Calandra for his responses. "As far as we're concerned, when you ask a question that corresponds to all the rules on a very important subject of national concern, like Canada's involvement in the war in Iraq, Canadians deserve better," he said.

Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau said the issue is an example of Parliament's dysfunction, but declined to criticize Mr. Scheer. "I look forward to the Speaker continuing to behave in a responsible and impartial manner," he said.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter