Skip to main content

New Democratic Party Leader Thomas Mulcair speaks in Ottawa on Sept. 16, 2013.

CHRIS WATTIE/REUTERS

The new Parliamentary Budget Officer has quickly run afoul of the Official Opposition Leader over how the PBO should deal with the continued refusal of departments to disclose spending cuts.

It has been less than three weeks since Jean-Denis Fréchette was appointed as the permanent replacement to Kevin Page, the first PBO, who left the position in March after his five-year term expired. Clearly, there will be no honeymoon for Mr. Fréchette.

"You now seem to believe it is acceptable to allow [the Parliament of Canada Act] to be ignored without doing anything to protect the rights of MPs," writes Thomas Mulcair, the NDP Leader, in a terse letter to Mr. Fréchette dated Sept. 18.

Story continues below advertisement

In taking the job, Mr. Fréchette inherited a long-running dispute involving Mr. Mulcair, the PBO and federal deputy ministers. Mr. Mulcair had asked the PBO to provide information on spending cuts, but many departments have refused to provide the PBO with the information needed to answer Mr. Mulcair's questions.

Mr. Mulcair and Mr. Page took the dispute to Federal Court, which dismissed the complaint this year on a technicality with a ruling that suggested the court could look at the issue again if the request were handled differently.

Interim PBO Sonia L'Heureux essentially followed that advice over the summer by reasking the federal departments for information on behalf of Mr. Mulcair. Most departments continued to ignore the request.

In a Sept. 16 letter to Mr. Mulcair, the new PBO argues that he doesn't think returning to Federal Court is a good idea.

He writes that it could lead to several appeals – possibly as high as the Supreme Court of Canada – with no guarantee of success.

"While pursuing this matter in court always remains an option, it involves significant risks," Mr. Fréchette wrote, before outlining all of the government's potential options for appeals. "Given the foregoing, I prefer to exhaust parliamentary remedies."

That response clearly did not sit well with Mr. Mulcair.

Story continues below advertisement

"I am formally requesting you take this matter back to the Federal Court to defend both your right to this information, and my right to this analysis," Mr. Mulcair wrote.

"This request – an analysis of how Conservative budget cuts will affect Canadians – is too important for us to abandon it."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter