Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

NDP Leader Tom Mulcair takes part in a debate in the House of Commons in Ottawa on April 12.

Adrian Wyld/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Tom Mulcair made it clear Wednesday he intends to stay at the helm of the federal New Democrats until the party chooses his successor — and this time, he enlisted his fellow NDP caucus members to endorse the decision.

Talk of persistent grumbling within the caucus has been dogging the NDP leader ever since he confronted Sunday's rank-and-file vote of non-confidence by declaring he would wait to leave until after the party had picked his replacement.

Indeed, when he gathered his fellow MPs in the foyer of the House of Commons for a news conference following a longer-than-usual caucus meeting, there was a sense that perhaps a change of heart was coming.

Story continues below advertisement

Instead, Mulcair doubled down.

"The reason that I'm here is to make sure that we have stability and continuity as we prepare to have a new leader; that's what the members decided," he said after the meeting.

"In the meantime, I was elected by the entire membership as leader; caucus has asked me to stay on until that leadership review, and I'm proud to be able to do that."

On Sunday, party members overwhelmingly voted to replace Mulcair — a legacy of the party's crushing third-place finish in last October's federal election, following a campaign that began with the NDP looking poised to form their first federal government.

The majority of delegates at the event — 52 per cent — voted in favour of a leadership review, which is scheduled to take place within the next 24 months. That means Mulcair could remain leader for up to two years despite having the support of less than half of the delegates at the convention.

In the meantime, Mulcair said he can also be a boon to the party with issues like fundraising.

"I think that is one of the things where I can continue to help if people require my aid," he said.

Story continues below advertisement

If they want me in to give a hand with that, you better believe that you're showing all of your experience when you talk about the importance of fundraising, especially with an impending leadership race."

Mulcair described Wednesday's discussion as the "best caucus meeting" he has ever attended.

"Every single member of caucus got to say everything thing that was on their mind," he said. "I can only tell you this: it was an inspiring, uplifting, positive meeting, and the result is with me today."

The show of solidarity was clearly meant to quash talk among some NDP MPs who have openly questioned whether he ought to be sticking around, considering the unequivocal message that came out of the convention.

Indeed, caucus members all seemed to be singing from the same song book.

"He has the strength we need to lead us through this transition period and he has the support, the full support of caucus," said rookie MP Tracey Ramsey.

Story continues below advertisement

"I'm very happy that he's staying on and that he will continue to do his work in the House, which he is fantastic at."

It is important to remember that delegates who voted in favour of a leadership review can still agree that Mulcair brings many skills to the NDP's fight against the Liberal government, said Quebec MP Matthew Dube.

"In the interim, as well, let's face it, we have no doubt that some of my caucus colleagues will be focusing on leadership bids," he said.

"So, to have as much talent as we can on board, that's certainly something that's important."

The NDP federal council, its key decision-making team, is expected to meet in May to further discuss setting the wheels in motion for a leadership race.

Veteran B.C. MP Nathan Cullen, a 2012 leadership contender, says he is considering a leadership bid and is discussing the possibility with his family.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies