Skip to main content

Downtown Vancouver skyline. The Canadian Infrastructure Report Card says about 12 per cent of municipal infrastructure is in poor or very poor condition.

DARRYL DYCK/The Globe and Mail

Nearly a quarter of municipal buildings in Canada are more than 50 years old and cities aren't spending enough to maintain their assets, according to a sweeping review of the state of local infrastructure.

The Canadian Infrastructure Report Card, which will be released on Monday, is based on detailed surveys of municipalities from across the country.

It says about 12 per cent of municipal infrastructure is in poor or very poor condition and those assets would cost $141-billion to replace. A further $247-billion in assets are in fair condition.

Story continues below advertisement

The report card comes out as the federal Liberal government is preparing a 2016 budget that will implement promises to greatly expand infrastructure spending.

Several economists are urging Ottawa to consider spending even more than planned in order to stimulate a Canadian economy facing lower-than-expected growth due to steep declines in commodity prices.

The survey, led by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, provides a new level of detail regarding the types of infrastructure that are most in need of repair or replacement.

"The report makes it very evident that you can either make smart repairs today or hold off and make very expensive repairs later," Vancouver Councillor Raymond Louie, who is president of the federation, said in an interview.

Mr. Louie said the survey is a reminder that while repairing existing infrastructure is "not sexy," the importance of repairs can't be lost in the current focus on finding ways to spend promised new cash from the federal government.

For instance, a breakdown of municipal buildings that are more than 50 years old shows that shelters top the list at 44 per cent, followed by community centres at 37 per cent and daycare centres at 25 per cent.

Overall, the report is in line with many other warnings that Canada is not spending enough to maintain its existing infrastructure and that this underspending will cause problems in the future.

Story continues below advertisement

"Survey results demonstrate that, if our current rates of reinvestment do not change, the condition of Canada's existing municipal infrastructure will decline," states a copy of the 164-page report, which was provided to The Globe and Mail.

It says a long-term plan is needed to ensure that Canadians can continue to rely upon essential public services without disruption.

The report card project was also led by the Canadian Construction Association, the Canadian Public Works Association and the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.

The report is based on survey results that were provided by 120 municipalities. Some of the report's national estimates are based on extrapolations of those results in order to account for communities that did not participate.

One of the main points of concern raised in the report is the amount of money spent by municipalities to maintain existing properties. The report measures this in terms of the reinvestment rate, which is the renewal budget as a percentage of the asset's replacement value.

This measurement shows that roads and sidewalks, drinking-water pipes, storm-water maintenance, sports and recreational facilities, and bridges are currently the most underfunded.

Story continues below advertisement

The Liberal government is promising a plan that would spend an additional $60-billion on infrastructure over the next 10 years, split evenly among public transit, green infrastructure and social infrastructure.

A briefing note prepared for Infrastructure Minister Amarjeet Sohi says that while there are many estimates of how much money needs to be spent on infrastructure in Canada, "infrastructure is, on average, getting younger."

According to the Infrastructure Canada briefing note, the average age of public infrastructure has declined from 17.8 years to 14.7 years from 2000 to 2013.

The note shows that the minister was warned by officials that it is hard to measure the state of Canada's infrastructure.

"There is a lack of data at the more granular level to determine if existing infrastructure is supporting current and future needs, due in part to weak asset management practices," it states. "This is a barrier to strategic decision-making."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter