Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

NDP and Tories’ push against banking fees won’t help consumers, critic charges

The NDP is pushing for a cap on automated bank-machine fees, while the governing Conservatives promise more no-fee banking.

FRED LUM/THE GLOBE AND MAIL

The NDP is pushing for a cap on automated bank-machine fees, while the governing Conservatives promise more no-fee banking – but not everyone is convinced either measure will help much.

The New Democrats have introduced a motion urging the government to cap the fees charged to consumers who use ABMs.

At the same time, the government is all but promising to make good on its Throne Speech pledge to provide Canadians with more free options for their everyday banking chores.

Story continues below advertisement

But Duff Conacher of the group Democracy Watch says the only way to protect consumers from gouging is to impose limits on big banks' profit.

Conacher says capping ABM fees or providing more free banking options will only push the banks to find other ways to increase the cost to consumers.

The Harper government promised last fall that it would find ways to make banking free of charge for more people.

Under questioning Monday from the opposition benches, Kevin Sorenson, minister of state for finance, repeated that promise.

"Our government will take further action to expand no-cost banking options available to Canadians," Sorenson told the Commons.

The Canadian Bankers Association says 29 per cent of Canadians already pay no service fees on bank accounts, while another 34 per cent pay between $1 and $15 per month.

And it sees ABM fees as a "convenience" charge for people who choose to use bank machines that are privately operated or not affiliated with a consumer's own banking institution.

Story continues below advertisement

Sorenson did not elaborate on the government's plans.

The New Democrat motion, meanwhile, is calling for a 50-cent cap on individual transaction fees.

NDP finance critic Peggy Nash said capping fees will help vulnerable Canadians.

"Eight consecutive budgets and no action," Nash told the Commons.

"Even the Finance Minister knows that this is a legitimate problem and has said so, especially so for seniors, students and persons with disabilities. And yet he chooses to do nothing about it."

But even if fees are capped, banks will find a way to make money elsewhere, said Conacher.

Story continues below advertisement

"Capping one fee will not be effective because the banks will just hike other fees, or interest rates, to make up whatever they lose from having one fee capped," he said.

"The effective way to stop gouging is to have independent audits of every division of the banks' operations, and wherever excessive profits are found, fees or interest rates would be required to be reduced."

Report an error
As of December 20, 2017, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this resolved by the end of January 2018. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.