Skip to main content

Amarjeet Sohi, Minister of Infrastructure and Communities, speaks to reporters in Ottawa on May 9, 2017.

Sean Kilpatrick/THE CANADIAN PRESS

The proposed Canada Infrastructure Bank will receive a full day of debate Thursday on the floor of the House of Commons amid concern the $35-billion bank is being rushed through Parliament.

The opposition NDP announced it will use its opposition day to trigger a day-long debate on the bank and will also force a vote calling on the government to remove legislation creating the bank from the Liberal budget bill so that it can be studied as standalone legislation.

The Canada Infrastructure Bank Act is included as part of Bill C-44, the Liberal government's omnibus budget bill. The act would create a $35-billion infrastructure bank that would be managed at arm's length from government as a Crown corporation. The goal of the bank is to attract private capital, including pension funds, to take a leadership role and ownership stake in building Canadian infrastructure.

Story continues below advertisement

Related: Infrastructure Bank risks slowing down projects, internal report warns

NDP infrastructure critic Matthew Dubé said his party finds it troubling that the government is moving ahead with filling executive positions for the bank even though it has not yet been studied and approved by Parliament.

The announcement of the NDP opposition day comes after The Globe and Mail reported that the Liberal majority was only planning to hold one committee meeting focused exclusively on the infrastructure bank legislation.

"Having a one- or two-hour study on something that's so significantly going to change the landscape of how infrastructure is funded in Canada is not sufficient," Mr. Dubé said Wednesday. "A lot of the decisions have been made behind closed doors with the people who stand to benefit from this scheme."

Mr. Dubé said the opposition day will force a public debate on the issue. He called on the Liberals to support the motion to split the budget bill.

"We were promised in the last election, no more omnibus legislation. This is an omnibus bill. We were promised this bank was going to be leveraging low interest rates for public spending and public infrastructure. That's not what we're seeing now. We're seeing a large privatization scheme," he said. "So I think there's a lot of issues from the last election that are at play here and hopefully some of the Liberal members will remember what was promised in the last election and will support us on this."

Federal Infrastructure Minister Amarjeet Sohi said Wednesday that it is up to committees to decide how much time they wish to study the infrastructure bank legislation. He defended the decision to include the bank legislation in the budget bill.

Story continues below advertisement

"The infrastructure plan and the creation of the bank is part of the overall efforts to grow our economy and create jobs and that is directly tied to the budget," he said in an interview. "If [the committee] feels they need more time, that is a decision they will make.

"From my point of view, we have done extensive consultation. We have broad support from stakeholders, whether they're investors, whether they're municipalities who will build infrastructure or provinces or others in the building trades and the unions because people see the potential of this creating jobs, they see the potential of this building infrastructure. So we are not hearing concerns from whose behalf we are doing this."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter