Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

New Brunswick’s David Alward meets with Alberta leader Alison Redford next month.

Dave Chan/The Globe and Mail

New Brunswick Premier David Alward is headed to Alberta to inject some political momentum into a proposed $5-billion, cross-Canada oil pipeline that he describes as a nation-building project.

The Progressive Conservative Premier will make his first visit to Alberta early next month, where he will meet with his counterpart, Alison Redford, travel to Fort McMurray to tour the oil sands, and visit industry executives in Calgary.

In an interview, Mr. Alward expressed enthusiasm for the proposed TransCanada pipeline project that would bring western oil to eastern Canadian refineries, and perhaps allow for crude exports from the deep-water port of Saint John.

Story continues below advertisement

"This is something that is potentially a game-changer for New Brunswick, but more importantly than just New Brunswick, for all of Canada," Mr. Alward said.

Ms. Redford echoed that enthusiasm in an interview, characterizing the west-east pipeline as "critically important." She added, too, that she believes the project is "quite feasible" and "economically viable" for the industry.

TransCanada Corp. is still pondering the project. It must gauge whether oil companies will commit to ship sufficient volumes to justify the investment. The line – much of it to be converted from an existing gas pipeline – could carry between 500,000 and one million barrels a day of oil.

Mr. Alward's full-throated endorsement of TransCanada's plan contrasts sharply with reaction in British Columbia to the Northern Gateway project. B.C. Premier Christy Clark has thrown up barriers to the pipeline, which would carry oil sands bitumen to the port of Kitimat for export by supertanker.

And it comes as TransCanada faces increased risks to its long-delayed Keystone XL pipeline after President Barack Obama used this week's inaugural address to elevate climate change as a top priority for his administration in its second term. Mr. Obama's speech was "not encouraging" for supporters of the Keystone XL pipeline, federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty told Reuters news service in an interview in Davos, Switzerland on Friday.

Much is at stake for both Mr. Alward and Ms. Redford.

For New Brunswick, the project could mean jobs, a much-needed economic boost to the small "have-not" province that is lacking in natural resources.

Story continues below advertisement

Under the most ambitious scenario, the pipeline would bring oil from western North America – Canada and the U.S. – to refineries in Quebec and New Brunswick. The Irving Oil refinery in Saint John is the largest in the country but relies entirely on imported oil which is far more costly than North American crude.

The company has said it welcomes any commercially viable effort to provide greater access to North American crude sources, but it has not committed to the pipeline proposal.

Saint John's deep-water port, which can accommodate massive tankers, makes it attractive for large-volume exports.

Ms. Redford, meanwhile, needs to find new markets for Alberta's oil. The lack of pipeline capacity to key markets has driven down the price of Canadian crude and blown a major hole in the province's revenue projections.

The Alberta Premier warn Albertans last week about the province's financial woes, saying sagging oil prices will rob the province of $6-billion in revenue this year.

The politicians are not being asked to provide funding for the pipeline. Nor does Ms. Redford expect to be asked to contribute. But their political backing is important in building public support for the pipeline project – or at the very least avoiding the kind of roadblocks that loom in British Columbia.

Story continues below advertisement

TransCanada's president for energy operations, Alex Pourbaix, said eastern Canada is a logical market for growing North American oil supplies, though the refineries would mainly process light oil rather than diluted bitumen from the oil sands.

The Calgary-based company is considering a range of options, including a smaller-scale project that would stop in Quebec, and a grander vision that would deliver oil to Saint John for both domestic consumption and some export potential.

Ms. Redford and Mr. Alward have also been courting Quebec Premier Pauline Marois to support the project. She faces a determined environmental lobby that opposes new oil pipelines from Alberta, but her province is home to two refineries – one in Montreal and one in Quebec City – that now depend on expensive imported oil.

The Alberta Premier said she met recently with Quebec Finance Minister Nicolas Marceau who "was very optimistic" about the project.

With a file from Rhéal Séguin in Quebec City

 

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty is floating the idea of moving trapped Alberta oil out via pipelines to Churchill, Man., or St. John, N.B., if the Keystone and Northern Gateway projects falter.

Story continues below advertisement

"There are lots of alternatives," Mr. Flaherty said Sunday on Global TV's The West Block. "We can explore all of them and it's one of our priorities, major projects to encourage economic growth and exports."

He said those other options include "pipelines to the East to New Brunswick to St. John, pipeline to Churchill, pipeline through the Rockies."

– Barrie McKenna

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies