Skip to main content

Greg Rickford is sworn in as minister of state for science and technology at Rideau Hall on July 15, 2013.

ADRIAN WYLD/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Observers of the Harper government's sometimes frayed relationship with Canadian researchers say they are not anticipating a substantive change in federal science policy after Monday's cabinet shuffle.

Gary Goodyear, minister of state (science and technology) for the past five years, was replaced by Greg Rickford of Kenora in the shuffle.

Mr. Rickford was a nurse and lawyer before he was elected to Parliament in 2008, and his name has not been closely associated with science and technology issues in Canada before today. Before taking up the portfolio, he served as parliamentary secretary to the minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development.

Story continues below advertisement

"He's got the political credentials, but that's about it," said Paul Dufour, adjunct professor at the University of Ottawa's Institute for Science, Society and Policy.

He added that Mr. Rickford will report to James Moore, the new federal Industry Minister, who has similarly little experience with science and technology issues. "Both of these guys are starting from scratch."

Mr. Rickford's most obvious connection to science policy may be coincidental and not a particularly positive one: His northwestern Ontario riding includes the Experimental Lakes Area, the federal research facility whose funding the government abruptly cut last year.

In May, Mr. Rickford announced the government had signed a memorandum of understanding with the International Institute for Sustainable Development, based in Winnipeg, to transfer operation of the ELA. The government had been widely criticized for shuttering the facility, which conducts research on environmental contamination.

Scott Findlay, a University of Ottawa biologist and member of Evidence for Democracy, which advocates for transparency in federal science policy, said Mr. Rickford is an "unknown quantity" in the Canadian research community, as Mr. Goodyear was before him.

"Perhaps I am simply showing my bias here, but having a scientist at the helm of the federal science and technology ship would seem to be a worthwhile experiment to try for a change," he said.

Dr. Findlay added that it may not make much difference who the minister is when so much of federal science policy is driven by the Prime Minister's Office.

Story continues below advertisement

Whether he drove them or not, during his tenure Mr. Goodyear faced public ire over a range of federal science policies, from restrictions on media access to government researchers to earmarking grants for science in aid of private industry. Mr. Goodyear also made headlines in 2009 over whether he believes in evolution. He eventually said he did, albeit in a rather unscientific way.

Mr. Goodyear also clashed with the Canadian Association of University Teachers, which has since launched a Get Science Right campaign that takes aim at federal policies it says are detrimental to the future of Canadian research.

The association's president, Jim Turk, said the group will ask to meet with Mr. Rickford.

"This is a government that's putting a moderate amount of money into science. It's just spending the money badly," he said. "We look forward to the chance to explain our concerns to him and see if there's any openness to reconsider the direction they're going."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter