Skip to main content

Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver is pictured during Question Period in March, 2013. Mr. Oliver is defending a new 10-page application form that the public must fill out before being allowed to comment on proposed pipeline projects.

CHRIS WATTIE/REUTERS

Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver is defending a new 10-page application form that the public must fill out before being allowed to comment on proposed pipeline projects.

The National Energy Board rolled out the new screening process this month for consultations on the reversal of Enbridge's Line 9 pipeline from Sarnia, Ont., to Montreal.

Before submissions will even be considered, the public and experts must first apply to the board.

Story continues below advertisement

Oliver told a Commons committee the rules are not designed to stop the public from participating and that anyone directly affected by the pipeline changes must be heard by the National Energy Board, citing the example of a farmer whose fields the pipeline crosses.

Oliver says the "public policy objective" of the screening came out of the Northern Gateway pipeline hearings, where 4,400 individuals registered to comment but only about 1,400 "actually showed up."

The minister describes such tactics as an attempt to "game the system."

"The clear objective behind certain groups was to delay the process and to defeat the project," Oliver said.

Inside the committee room, NDP MP Claude Gravelle asked Oliver if he could "translate" the following government instructions to would-be public interveners on the Enbridge pipeline:

"Before you continue with this form, refer to the board's guidance document on section 55.2 and participation in a Facilities Hearing attached to the Hearing Order OH-002-2013 as Appendix VI, and again as Appendix III of Procedural Update No. 1 for OH-002-2013," said Gravelle, reading from the instructions.

After Conservative MPs on the committee tried to run interference on Gravelle's line of inquiry, Oliver responded to the New Democrat: "This is a ridiculous question and you know it."

Story continues below advertisement

In the case of the Line 9 pipeline hearings, the public was given two weeks – until this Friday, April 19 – to complete and submit the application to be heard.

Peter Julian, the NDP natural resources critic, called the application form for public participation "convoluted and complex."

"What they're trying to do is say if you're not directly impacted that you have no place at all, and they're drawing the lines in a very careful way to exclude the vast majority of the Canadian public," said Julian.

Despite his trouble sorting through the bureaucratic wording in the National Energy Board's application, Oliver later insisted to reporters that "it's not as complex as it's made out to be."

"If you are an expert wanting to testify, then the form is a little bit longer. But an expert, presumably, can fill it out," said the minister.

"For the average person, it's not complex at all."

Story continues below advertisement

Reversing the directional flow of Line 9 to east-west may be one of the less controversial pipeline hearings currently on the public radar.

A 200-kilometre stretch was already approved for reversal in 2011 and the remaining 600-plus kilometres to Montreal is now up for review.

The same pipeline, built in the 1970s, previously carried oil from western Canada east to Montreal before the line was reversed to bring imported oil to Sarnia from Montreal in 1999.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies