Skip to main content

Ontario Progressive Conservative Leader Tim Hudak, shown March 4, 2013.

PETER POWER/THE GLOBE AND MAIL

Ontario's Progressive Conservatives will step up the pressure on the minority Liberals to allow a confidence vote over costly gas-plant cancellations, party sources say. The Tories plan to launch a petition and use "parliamentary tricks" to ensure the motion is debated.

The want of confidence motion, to be tabled Monday and obtained by The Globe and Mail, cites the hefty price tag for the plants as a reason the government should be brought down and fresh elections held.

"The Auditor General confirmed on April 15th, 2013 that the true cost of cancelling the Mississauga Gas Plant was $275-million … or 45 per cent higher than what the Liberal Government had repeatedly told the people of Ontario," it reads in part.

Story continues below advertisement

Unlike many Westminster-style parliaments, which allow the opposition some leeway to move non-confidence motions at will, Ontario's legislature would require government consent for the vote. The Liberals have indicated they will not grant it.

But the Tories hope pressure, through both the petition and inside the House, will make Premier Kathleen Wynne change her mind.

"In our parliamentary system, there is an expectation that a non-confidence motion would be debated and voted on. Our rules in Ontario are a little different, but in most other parliament that have the same system, want of confidence motions are debated and voted on. They don't just sit on the order paper," a senior Tory source said. "But we're going to need to put public pressure on the Liberals."

Last fall, the opposition parties made the Liberals' lives miserable by raising the controversy in the legislature at every opportunity. And the Tories are angling to do it again until the confidence motion is allowed to come up for a vote.

Although the government must agree to a vote, the opposition does not require its permission to debate the motion in the legislature. The Tories could, for instance, use debates on other bills to instead discuss the confidence move.

"There are ways to debate this, not necessarily to come to a vote, but there are some other parliamentary tricks that when you're debating other bills, because this is a non-confidence motion, you can talk about it extensively in the House," the source said. "They may get tired of us talking about it."

The government will face a confidence vote over its budget, to be tabled Thursday. But the Tories believe they have a better chance of persuading the New Democrats to vote with them to topple the government over a gas-plant-specific motion rather than the budget. The Liberals are expected to put numerous NDP-friendly policies in the budget to make it hard for the third party to vote against it.

Story continues below advertisement

So far, the NDP have been reluctant to team up with the PCs, dismissing the confidence motion as nothing more than a publicity stunt.

"This is an attempt on the part of the Tories to … find some weird way of trying to get a headline that doesn't get you anything in the end," NDP House Leader Gilles Bisson said.

Ms. Wynne, meanwhile, has insisted that the opposition will get just one chance to topple her government and trigger an election.

"There is no one in this House that's looking forward more to the expression of confidence in the government on the budget than I am," she said in question period last week. "We share that anticipation, and I look forward to it."

The government cancelled two gas-fired power plants, in Oakville and Mississauga, in what was widely seen as a political move to win area ridings in the 2011 election.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.