Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

An Emirates Air jet sits at the terminal beside an Air Canada plane at Pearson airport in Toronto on Nov. 19, 2010.

J.P. MOCZULSKI

Bob Rae is escalating the dispute with the United Arab Emirates over landing rights, drawing the ire of the Harper government and now attracting criticism from Air Canada.

One Tory MP characterizes the Liberal foreign affairs critic as an "international doormat" while a senior Air Canada official suggests it would be wiser for Mr. Rae to speak up for Canadian workers rather than campaigning for votes in the Middle East.

All of this was provoked by a toughly-worded travel blog - posted by Mr. Rae Monday - in which he accuses the Conservative government of eating itself whole on the issue of competition in the airline industry and playing favourites with Air Canada.

Story continues below advertisement

"It is surely an ironic twist that the old Reform Party and Stephen Harper have become advocates of closed skies and pure and simple protectionism," Mr. Rae wrote. He is on a personal trip through the region and decided to travel to the UAE to meet with government officials and assess the situation for himself.

"Canadian public policy on Air Canada and open skies needs to be clarified. Recent comments by John Baird ('tens of thousands of jobs are at stake') would seem to mean that Air Canada is now being treated as a company to be defended at all costs," Mr. Rae writes, referring to the Government House Leader's defence last month of the government's decision to deny extra landing slots to two state-backed UAE airlines. "Yet other aspects of policy - for example, continuing high charges and fees at Pearson Airport in particular - seem to indicate that competitiveness is not taken entirely seriously by the Harper government."

Mr. Rae's comments did not sit well with Air Canada's chief operating officer Duncan Dee, who was angry after reading the opposition MP's blog.

"I would caution the government from taking advice from a party that oversaw about a dozen Canadian airline bankruptcies during its tenure in office from 1993 to 2006," Mr. Dee told The Globe. "Rather than campaigning for votes in Dubai or Abu Dhabi, Mr. Rae should be speaking up for the hundreds of thousands of Canadians whose livelihoods depend directly or indirectly on a strong and vibrant Air Canada and Canadian airline industry."

The dispute began dramatically last October when Defence Minister Peter MacKay and Chief of Defence Staff Walt Natynczyk were prohibited from landing at Camp Mirage, a secret airbase used by the Canadian Forces as a logistics hub for its activities in Afghanistan. The two were returning from a Thanksgiving visit to troops in Kandahar.

The airbase is no longer available to the Canadian military, which had been using it for free for a decade and relocating to other bases is costing the government millions of dollars. In addition, the UAE imposed required expensive visas requirements for Canadians to travel into the country.

"The effective closure of the base at Camp Mirage ... reflected the UAE's frustration and anger at being stiff-armed by the Harper government," Mr. Rae writes.

Story continues below advertisement

The Liberal MP believes the Tory decision was not a "wise one" as it leaves the perception that UAE officials were linking a commercial dispute to fighting "violent extremism." But he suggests that all is not lost and that it's not too late to repair the relationship.

"The UAE is an important hub and a potentially larger economic partner for Canada," Mr. Rae writes. "Whatever additional landing rights might be negotiated could be phased in over time, and should continue to be watched closely for any potential impact."

Mr. Rae's travels are being watched closely - and with a critical eye - by the Harper government.

"Canadians expect that when Canadian MPs travel abroad they represent Canada and Canadian interests," Dimitri Soudas, the Prime Minister's spokesman, told The Globe on Sunday. "It would be extremely regrettable if Canadian interests were undermined in any way."

However, Conservative MP Dean Del Mastro, the parliamentary secretary to the Heritage Minister, is much stronger in his assessment of Mr. Rae's travels, reflecting some of the anger in the Tory caucus over this issue.

"If Bob Rae wants to play the part of international door mat rather than take a principled stance in support of Canadian workers and industry he is once again demonstrating the kind of skills we saw first hand during his bleak term as the premier of Ontario," the Peterborough MP told The Globe.

Story continues below advertisement

"Canada has been a friend and ally of the UAE and deserves to be treated with respect. ... as the ninth largest economy in the world we have a lot to offer to the UAE, the world's 35th largest economy. Allowing them to dictate the terms of trade unilaterally, however, isn't the kind of trade relationship we need."

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies