Skip to main content

Bob Rae dismissed Stephen Harper's Conservatives as "knuckle draggers" today as the Prime Minister stands firm in his refusal to put climate change on the agenda of the upcoming G8 and G20 summits.

"We have a consensus around the world that climate change and innovation are at the heart of the new economy. That is what the Secretary-General of the United Nations recognizes," the Toronto Centre MP said, filling in for Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff. "Why will the government of Canada not come firmly into the 21st century and start showing some leadership on climate change for a change?"

This was the second straight day that the opposition went after the government on the environment. Debate was sparked yesterday by Ban Ki-moon, who visited Ottawa and called on the Prime Minister to play a leadership role on climate change at this summer's global summits.

Story continues below advertisement

Transport Minister John Baird defended the government's record on climate change, arguing that Environment Minister Jim Prentice has provided "leadership" in negotiating "successful emissions for the auto sector between Canada and the United States."

And he mocked Mr. Ignatieff's comments of four years ago that the Liberals didn't "get it done" on climate change when they were in government. Mr. Ignatieff was not leader at the time.

Bloc Leader Gilles Duceppe, meanwhile, added his voice to the chorus of criticism, arguing the Harper government does not deserve to succeed in its bid for a seat at the UN Security Council because of its intransigence in recognizing that the environment and the economy could be dealt with at the G8 and G20 summits.

"Ideological positions about the environment, women's rights and aboriginals … they've caused enough trouble here," Mr. Duceppe said. "With this attitude does the Prime Minister understand that Canada doesn't deserve a seat at the UN under this government?"

Not surprisingly, Mr. Duceppe's assertions provoked a strong response from the government, including accusations of "sabotage" from Natural Resources Minister Christian Paradis, who was standing in for an absent Prime Minister.

"We have always been clear," Mr. Paradis said. "The government's priority at G20 is to talk about the economy, job creation … These are terms that are misunderstood by the Bloc. They never talk about that because that is never their priority.

"Once again we are seeing progress here in Canada and these people are trying to sabotage this. … Their own only cause is to separate Quebec from Canada. It's as simple as that - sabotage, sabotage, sabotage."

Story continues below advertisement

It wasn't just the Liberals and Bloc concerned about environmental issues. NDP Leader Jack Layton has been consistently questioning the government over what he believes is a lack of planning in the event of an oil-spill catastrophe such as the one in the Gulf of Mexico.

"The exploratory well drilling season starts in just a couple of weeks and we are not seeing action from the government," Mr. Layton said, noting that in the United States the limits on corporate liability may be increased to as much as $10-billion.

"Guess what they are here in Canada? They are $10-million, a thousand times less," he said. "The estimates for the cleanup in the gulf are running at $450-million and we all know it will end up higher, then there are the billions of dollars in damage to fishing and tourism. Will the government at least realize that $10-million is not enough protection for Canadians?"

Replied Mr. Baird: "Let me say a few things to the Leader of the New Democratic Party. One is that there are no permits to drill in the Arctic, and let me remind the Leader of the New Democratic Party of another fact. We have unlimited liability for oil companies with respect to pollution. Polluter pays, but that is not good enough. We have to have strong and effective regulations to ensure it does not happen."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter