Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Government House Leader Peter Van Loan speaks in the Commons foyer on June 2, 2011.

Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press

Stephen Harper's Conservatives want to move closer to a one citizen, one vote system to "see some fairness" for provinces whose populations are increasing, Government House Leader Peter Van Loan says.

Speaking to reporters in advance of the House getting back to work Thursday, Mr. Loan said some votes are not worth the same as others - and this is undemocratic.

"What has happened is that we've have had a situation arise where votes are worth very different amounts across the country," he said. "This is because the existing formula restrains the growth of seats in areas that are experiencing high growth, particularly in Ontario, Alberta, British Columbia."

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Van Loan was reacting to a report in The Globe and Mail that revealed the government wants to increase seats in the House of Commons to 338 from 308. The additional seats would go to Alberta, Ontario and British Columbia.

Legislation on this initiative would not be introduced immediately, Mr. Van Loan said. "It's a fundamental principle of democracy to move closer to equal weight for [voters]"

But Quebec - and this could be where the Tories are vulnerable - would not see any increase from the 75 seats currently allotted to the province.

Mr. Van Loan didn't buy the notion that Quebeckers will be upset or that the Tories are wading into dangerous waters.

"I think fundamentally people understand that democracy should have democratic values behind it," he said. "I know that there are some who will try to exploit issues like this, create divisions but we live in a democracy."

However, opposition leaders had their own take on the proposed legislation, arguing that the bill must reflect fairness in all regions of the country - including Quebec.

"We have suggested in the House that work be done to try to find a way of balancing these various principles in a way that can work," said NDP Leader Jack Layton, who holds 59 seats in the province. "We're heartened to hear that from some sources ... that the government is looking at this sort of thing."

Story continues below advertisement

The Official Opposition Leader added, however, that his New Democrats want this considered in a "careful and proper fashion," suggesting Commons committee look at the issue.

Liberals struck a similar tone. "We'll see the distribution and we'll be sensitive," Interim Leader Bob Rae said.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies