Skip to main content

Illustratiion by Anthony Jenkins

Anthony Jenkins/The Globe and Mail

At least 30 aboriginal band chiefs received more pay than the average after-tax income of Canada's provincial premiers in 2008-09, according to data obtained by the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.

Using federal Access to Information laws, the organization asked the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs to provide the salary information for every band chief and councillor in Canada.

In response, the CTF received a list of salaries for the chiefs. The names of the chiefs and their locations were withheld and there was no information provided about money given to band councillors.

Story continues below advertisement

"It's disappointing, it's not appropriate," CTF Prairie director Colin Craig said in a telephone interview on Monday. "No matter what a politician's race, their earnings should be made public. That's how voters can hold those people accountable."

The government's response to the CTF did not include money that the chiefs received from band-owned enterprises and other funds set up with public dollars. Even so, 30 chiefs on the list took home more than $109,893 in 2008-09, which was the average after-tax income for Canadian premiers in that year. After-tax income was used because the chiefs pay no federal income tax.

The Taxpayers Federation says that means those chiefs are being paid the equivalent of more than $170,000 - more than the mayor of Toronto, who makes $167,800.

Grand Chief Ron Evans of the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs pointed out on CTV's Power Play that the average salary made by Canadians chiefs is about $60,000 and the issues that they have to deal with, including land claims, health care, and overcrowded housing, are stressful.

Chief Evans said he was glad that the taxpayers' federation has raised the issue because it is important to have a public discussion.



But, unlike the premiers, he said, the chiefs don't get a pension once they leave office.



He invited critics to work with the chiefs to level the playing field "to make sure we have pensions in place once we are out of office."

Story continues below advertisement

But Mr. Craig said he believes the number of chiefs who took home more than the average premier is actually much higher because band-own enterprises contribute substantial amounts to their overall remuneration.

"When you actually pull out the salaries for chiefs and councillors, there's more than just those two columns [salaries and honoraria]" Mr. Craig said. "Quite often they get money from economic development accounts which are largely set up through taxpayer subsidies. And then they have band-owned enterprises and travel accounts and all that. So the federal government chose to ignore all that."

For example, the information released by the government shows that the chief of the Peguis Reserve, the largest First Nation community in Manitoba with a population of approximately 7,200 people of Ojibway and Cree descent, received $126,030 in salary. But the Taxpayers Federation said it has documents to show that the chief received an additional $48,200.

"We know those amounts can be quite sizeable," Mr. Craig said. "There was one politician who had $203,000 that was in one of those other columns. So, to exclude those amounts, is a pretty serious omission of data."

Still, the information provided shows there are some chiefs earning large amounts of money, especially in light of the fact the population of bands is often not much bigger than that of a small town.

"I have got a couple of people saying, 'Wait a minute, are you suggesting every chief is corrupt?' " Mr. Craig added. "No far from it. ...We're just saying make this information transparent."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter