Skip to main content

Minister of National Defence Peter MacKay answers questions regarding Afghan detainees during Question Period in the House of Commons on Wednesday November 18, 2009.

Sean Kilpatrick

Seal meat is to be on the menu at the swank parliamentary restaurant and now Inuktitut is being spoken in the House of Commons. Parliament is rocking a decidedly northern theme these days.

At Question Period today, Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq, in answer to a planted question from a colleague, announced that the February meeting of G7 finance ministers and central bank governors is being held in Iqaluit.

"Today people of Nunavut are very pleased with our government's announcement and the recognition of Canada's Arctic as a place to meet," said the minister, in her native Inuktitut.

Story continues below advertisement

It's not the first time Inuktitut has been spoken in the House but the minister received a standing ovation nonetheless. She has been under fire of late over the controversy around delivery of the H1N1 vaccine.

Perhaps, she was also being feted for veering from her usual script.

Meanwhile, the serious business of Question Period revolved around several themes.

Toronto Centre MP and Liberal foreign affairs critic Bob Rae led off the daily session, (Leader Michael Ignatieff was away again) with a simple question: he wanted to know why it took 18 months for the Harper government to deal with "something as serious as firsthand evidence of torture by a Canadian public official?"

He didn't get his answer.

Instead Defence Minister Peter MacKay did everything but answer his questions, accusing the other side of "huffing and puffing and hyperventilating and pontificating."

He said the government acted and "improved upon regular visitations to see that conditions were in fact improving. We invested in the prison system and infrastructure itself."

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Rae was focused on this issue in advance of an appearance at a Commons committee by Richard Colvin, the diplomat who warned of possible torture in Afghan jails.

The other issue that concerned opposition MPs today was that of the sale of nuclear technology to India.

NDP Leader Jack Layton, sounding a little hoarse after missing two days because of a cold, pointed out that the last time the Canadian government sold nuclear technology to India, which was in the 1970s, "India took the opportunity to build a bomb."

Transport Minister John Baird told Mr. Layton to get real: "We have great faith in our Indian friends and partners. We are not living in the 1970s. We are living in 2009."

Prime Minister Stephen Harper has just wrapped up a three-day tour India . It was his first visit to the country. He is on his way home now.

And the Liberals have also not forgotten the issue of infrastructure spending and Conservative signage and advertising at infrastructure sites.

Story continues below advertisement

"Yesterday the government could not tell us why it erected an expensive sign in Gatineau to advertise the installation of another sign," Nova Scotia MP Mike Savage said. "In Yellowknife, another Conservative sign has been bought to advertise the installation of 'interior-exterior signs.' Signs, signs, everywhere a sign."

Mr. Savage wanted to know why the government is spending hundreds of thousands of taxpayers' dollars on signs when more and more Canadians are using food banks.

Transport Minister Baird characterized these signs as "signs of hope", and signs of opportunity.

It was not clear if Mr. Savage rolled his eyes at this point, or not.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter