Skip to main content

Ignatieff gets small bump in leadership poll

Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff steps off the campaign bus Saturday, April 30, 2011 in Paris, Ont.

Paul Chiasson/ The Canadian Press/Paul Chiasson/ The Canadian Press

It may be a case of far too little and way too late, but Michael Ignatieff's leadership scores enjoyed a modest one-day improvement as the federal election campaign entered its final weekend, while those of both Stephen Harper and Jack Layton declined.

Nanos Research has been daily tracking voter attitudes toward the party leaders since the campaign began. Over the past five weeks, one-day results have had far less significance than trends over time.

But with the Liberals facing the prospect of serious losses and third-place status when voters go to the polls Monday, any sign that people might be reconsidering is welcome news for Mr. Ignatieff.

Story continues below advertisement

His score among voters polled April 29 was 45. It had previously languished below 40.

Both Mr. Harper and Mr. Layton remain far ahead: Mr. Harper leads with a score of 95, having been 100 the day before, while Mr. Layton - whose score also dropped slightly- is close behind at 81.

So the gap between the two-front runners and the Liberal leader remains wide. But not quite as wide as it was.

The score is a compendium of voter responses to questions of which leader they prefer on matters of trust, competence and vision.

On the issues front, health care remains ahead as it has been through most of the campaign, but jobs and the economy is trending upward and has closed the gap to within four percentage points. About thirty per cent of Canadians identified health care as their most important concern, followed by jobs and the economy at 26 per cent.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter