Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Immigration Minister Jason Kenney speaks to reporters in the foyer of the House of Commons on May 30, 2012.

Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press

The Conservative government has taken "the unusual step" of publicly challenging a newspaper report and reminding journalists across the country that it's their job to get both sides of a story before racing to publication.

In an open letter, Immigration Minister Jason Kenney said the ministry wasn't approached about an article that appeared in Montreal's La Presse on June 11, about a Colombian woman facing deportation.

"Stories presenting only one side of a story can lead to public distrust of the rule of law," the letter states. "Factually incorrect or incomplete reporting usually leaves the impression that Canada's refugee determination system is unjust or heartless."

Story continues below advertisement

La Presse could not be immediately reached for comment. The paper's website quoted an immigration lawyer who said the minister's decision to release documents related to the case was unprecedented, and could break privacy laws.

The story, by reporter Anabelle Nicoud, details the troubles of 37-year-old Joanna Martinez. The story says she was born in Colombia and raised in New York, but returned to Colombia in her 20s with her husband. Ms. Martinez said her husband was kidnapped by drug traffickers, and once his ransom was paid they fled to Canada.

The story says her husband has been granted asylum in Canada, but she has been ordered out by June 27.

Mr. Kenney "has a point," La Presse editor Eric Trottier said. The paper does immigration stories with some regularity and has requested background information in the past through official channels, he said, but has always been told that the information would not be made  available.

"We didn't call to his office," Mr. Trottier said, adding the paper stands by its story. "But as you probably know when we do call Immigration Canada they have always the same answer, that we don't comment on those stories. That's why we didn't this time ... we had all of the information that we needed."

Mr. Kenney said the paper should have requested Ms. Martinez fill out a disclosure form so that Citizenship and Immigration Canada could share her case history, something Mr. Trottier said La Presse would do in the future (although he reserved the paper's right to publish without official requests being made).

If she had, he said, La Presse would have learned that Ms. Martinez has a criminal record in three states, has used as many as 20 aliases in the past, claimed nine different birthdays and couldn't prove she was in Colombia when the kidnapping is said to have occurred.

Story continues below advertisement

"Our request is simple: If you are a journalist writing about someone facing removal from Canada, please get a privacy waiver from the subject of your story so that we can provide the complete file to you," Mr. Kenney wrote.

"And if the subject of your story or their lawyer is refusing to provide you with a privacy waiver and the written decision from the Immigration and Refugee Board, you may want to ask them and yourself why they are refusing to do so."

Mr. Trottier said the minister is "playing politics" by criticizing the paper, and said it was a special case because Mr. Martinez's husband - who has a criminal record - was granted asylum even as she was refused. The paper will continue to cover the story.

"Mr. Kenney and his office are doing politics," he said. "We are doing journalism."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies