Skip to main content

The Liberals and New Democrats staged nearly identical photo ops yesterday to illustrate the shutting down of Parliament.

First up was NDP Leader Jack Layton, who stood at a podium surrounded by his caucus, positioned in front of the doors to the House of Commons chamber. A half an hour later Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff arrived. He too was surrounded by his caucus, also in front of the doors to the chamber.

There was one subtle difference, however. The big ornate wooden ornate doors to Commons were shut tight for the NDP photo op. Those very same doors, however, were wide open for the Liberal version.

Story continues below advertisement

Last night, an NDP official was gloating slightly, criticizing the Grits for the staging of their photo op. The official, who didn't want to be named, said that it was the closed doors that told the story of Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his decision to prorogue Parliament. He couldn't understand why the Liberals would leave them open.

A Liberal official said this morning they opened the doors to show the sad, empty, lifeless chamber. "We wanted to show that the room where we are supposed to be working was ready, lit, but empty," the official said. "We wanted people to see that it is idle."

It was also noted that press cameras "fought" for position to shoot extra footage of the empty chamber. The problem is, however, that Mr. Ignatieff was not in that empty chamber shot.

Global National led its prorogation piece on its broadcast last night with pictures of the NDP caucus and Mr. Layton. Images of Mr. Ignatieff and the Liberals were farther down in the story.

All this is to say that photo ops are important and carefully thought out. Indeed, while in opposition Dave Penner, who is now a senior member of the Prime Minister's Office, was known to get out an iron when they were on the road and make sure there were no wrinkles in the Canadian flags that were positioned behind Stephen Harper.

(Photo: Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Does prorogation matter? Leave your audio comments here.

Story continues below advertisement















Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.