Skip to main content
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
Get full digital access to globeandmail.com
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
// //

Evangelical Christian activist Charles McVety is shown outside his Toronto office on May 26, 2005.

Donald Weber

Stephen Harper's refusal to reopen the abortion debate risks suppressing the Conservative vote, a leading voice of Canadian social conservatism says.

"There is just no energy out there," Charles McVety, the evangelic leader and Christian activist, said in an interview. "Frankly, my fear for Stephen Harper is that being so overt standing against the pro-lifers, he risks not motivating Conservative voters."

Mr. McVety noted the Conservatives lost 160,000 votes between the 2006 and 2008 elections. He blames Mr. Harper's decision just before the 2008 campaign to block Conservative MP Ken Epps's private member's bill that would have made it a separate offence for killing a fetus when a pregnant woman was murdered.

Story continues below advertisement

"He lost massive numbers of votes," Mr. McVety said. "And I think, again, at the outset of this campaign - again saying he is not going to touch the abortion issue - I think that does not motivate Conservatives to get out and knock on doors and make phone calls and put signs up and hustle."

Historically, if voter turn-out is low "the Conservatives suffer - that's an absolute equation."

"Conservatives are conservative by nature so if they don't show up at the polls Harper may lose his bid for a majority," the president of the Canadian Christian College added.

The abortion debate was reignited last week after the Liberals leaked a tape of Brad Trost, the incumbent Conservative candidate in the riding of Saskatoon-Humboldt, bragging that he had contributed to the government's decision to "defund" the International Planned Parenthood Federation.

The Harper team went into damage-control mode, denying that any funding decision had been made. On the campaign trail, Mr. Harper repeated that would not reopen the abortion debate and that any effort to do so would "defeated" under his watch.

But Mr. Trost was partly correct. The IPPF has been in limbo, waiting to hear from CIDA about its 2010 funding proposal for $9-million over 18 months. This indicates to Mr. McVety that funding is not coming, despite what the Tories said last week.

"It hasn't been funded in over a year. I don't think it's coming," he said, noting, too, that the Harper government had announced last year that its G8 maternal-health initiative would not include funding for abortions.

Story continues below advertisement

"Internationally the Harper government has made it very clear that they are not funding abortion overseas," Mr. McVety said.

Domestically, though, he said his supporters would like to see the government yank funding for abortions.

"But that's fallen on deaf ears," he said. "This is something we continue to push on because we feel very strongly about it. But there are times when that message is more receptive than others. And frankly, when you're in a constant campaign mode as we've been in for the last seven years the controversial issues are not something that politicians entertain during a campaign."

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies