Skip to main content

Atlantic salmon fry are released into the Humber River near Toronto on May 30, 2011.

Peter Power/The Globe and Mail

The Conservative government is facing growing pressure to reverse its decision to end funding for the Experimental Lakes Area, a unique research zone in Northwestern Ontario where scientists can gauge the impact of pollution on ecosystems.

At a news conference in Ottawa Tuesday, New Democratic Party MPs criticized the government's budget-cutting decision, even as a group of internationally-renowned scientists urge the Ottawa to keep the centre open.

"The Conservative decision to stop funding this program again demonstrates their total disregard for the importance of scientific research," NDP fisheries critic Robert Chisholm told a news conference on Parliament Hill.

Story continues below advertisement

He said the ELA program supports international research that is essential for the monitoring and understanding of freshwater ecosystems and our fisheries, and cannot be replicated elsewhere.

Fisheries and Oceans told ELA scientists their funding would cease at the end of the fiscal year – April 1, 2013 – but a departmental official told The Globe and Mail the government is working aggressively to find a new operator in the hopes the centre can continue its work.

Fisheries Minister Keith Ashfield said scientific research remains the "backbone" of his department's mandate, and that freshwater research at other locations will meet its needs.

ELA scientists say they've seen no evidence that universities and agencies that support research there are being encouraged to take it over. And they say universities and provincial governments are undergoing budget austerity just as Ottawa is.

The cancellation of the program will have major consequences that will put the health of Canadians, our water and our environment at risk, deputy NDP environment critic Anne Minh Thu Quach told reporters.

"The Conservatives must stop slashing and reducing our environmental protection programs. It's the health of Canadians that's at stake," she said.

In an open letter Mr. Ashfield and Environment Minister Peter Kent, eight Canadian and international scientists said the ELA is irreplaceable as a place to do research on the impact of pollution on freshwater ecosystems.

Story continues below advertisement

"Canadians need and deserve an internationally renowned freshwater and fisheries research facility," they said in the letter.

"We strongly urge the government of Canada to reconsider the decision to close Canada's ELA, and recognize the importance of the ELA to the government's mandate to study, preserve and protect aquatic ecosystems."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies